11 Bravo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-02-06 03:30 PM
Original message |
The Rude Pundit explains why my Washington Post was unreadable this am. |
|
http://rudepundit.blogspot.comI thought it might have had something to do with Ernesto, but this makes more sense.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-02-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. gee ya think the rude pundit is just a bit pissed off more than usual? |
|
another excellent commentary from the rude one
|
kurth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-02-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Don't miss this paragraph: |
|
"Seems like only yesterday that the Post was not so forgiving about perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury discovered in the course of an investigation where the actual reason for the investigation had little or nothing to do with the perjury and possible conspiracy. From the January 22, 1998 Post: "President Clinton also reportedly denied any improper relationship in his own sworn deposition testimony in the Paula Jones suit on Saturday. If the allegations -- which were brought to Mr. Starr by former White House aide Linda R. Tripp -- prove true, they are of a different magnitude from any of the other myriad charges Mr. Clinton has fought back since taking office." Of course, what this had to do with a land deal in Arkansas is up for debate, no?"
|
acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-02-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Whoa, that was cold. 'Rude' is understating it. But it was definitely |
|
fair considering the subject matter.
|
11 Bravo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-02-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. The Rude One takes no prisoners, as a rule. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message |