Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 12:59 PM
Original message |
BREAKING: BUSH TO ABIDE BY RULE OF LAW |
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Does this mean we were breaking international law?...n/t |
Finder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:02 PM
Original message |
verse18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
2. So sad that this is truly breaking news. nt |
skiddlybop
(408 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Just like the signing statements, he'll say one thing for public image and do another.
|
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Which Means He Has Broken the Law |
|
He should be tried as well.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. At first I thought this was a badly-timed April Fools joke. |
|
Then I thought, "Well, maybe the Onion."
OK--convince me it's not the Onion.
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Wow, lots of work now for ACLU lawyers |
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. Time to scrape up another contribution to the ACLU. |
|
They're at the VERY TOP of my list.
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
7. That means he's going to resign, turn the admin over to Kerry... |
|
then fly to Baghdad to stand trial next to Saddam, right?
|
insane_cratic_gal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Since when? He's never followed it before |
|
Or do you mean, The law as he writes it you mean? those little foot notes he keeps writing in .. the law as he interprets it
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
9. "New" laws. "His" laws. "His" proposed legislation. |
|
More lies, more spin, more bullshit.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. The "out of control" judiciary told him he was breaking the law... |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 01:40 PM by Junkdrawer
so he simply will have the Republican congress rewrite said laws.
And you thought we weren't a nation of laws....
BTW: The Corporate media will cover his asking for new legislation. The breaking the current law thingy was eclipsed by the Karr/Ramsey orgy. Priorities you know.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. "Activist" bad, "REactivist" good, it seems. |
|
Appalling. Fucking appalling. The SCOTUS didn't go NEARLY far enough and this bastard makes a big deal of it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message |