Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 44th President is speaking in the Senate about Herr Rumsfeld

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:07 PM
Original message
The 44th President is speaking in the Senate about Herr Rumsfeld
Just in case anyone is interested :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm here...
Whooohooo!

"if the president had kept his eye on the ball in Afghanistan..."

go Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. ooo, he's getting his fire up
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Kerry called for Rumsfeld's resignation in 2003 and 2004 - More Dems
should have backed him up on that call. Why they didn't, even after Abu Ghraib, is a mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. He Just Made the Best Comment Ever
The army that took down Saddam was Clinton's army. He reminded the Senate that Bush had barely been president and the army was Clinton's. It was Wonderful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. woah good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm not so sure I'd be proud of that
A third rate army in a country weakened to its knees by 10 years of sanctions, which had not one single military aircraft able to fly because of air superiority and the 'no fly zones' is surrounded by the most technological powerful military in the world and squashes the hornets nest, only to find itself stuck in a quagmire.

Kerry never thinks more than six months ahead. That's a problem I have with him.

Yes, it was Clinton's army. Hell a second rate army could have done what was done in the first six weeks. Bush was an idiot to invade and attempt to occupy Iraq for all the reasons his daddy didn't do it. Kerry was irresponsible to enable it with the IWR which EVERYONE KNEW Bush wanted to use as a fig leaf to enable his little war adventure.

Screw em both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Amen.
If only Too Late John had rolled these things around his head back when something could have been DONE about it.

I never tire of being amused by the Go John Chorus, who somehow find a current fighting force in this man. Respectfully, Mr. Kerry should retire with dignity and let some new blood take up the charge. Hopefully, new blood that won't do things like cast the wrong vote at the wrong time, or throw in the towel so early in a national election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. But You're Forgetting Something
Americans who support the army find fault with Clinton. You may be right but those who don't think equate Dems and Clinton with lack of security. For the Repukes to say Clinton's army is bad is an attack (perhaps through the backdoor) of their President today. I think strategically, it was a very good point for him to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. That's true
Al Franken got in a physical fight with Oh'Really over making that comment after Afghanistan. Pretty Funny, really

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. He made a great case for Rumsfeld's removal and our disengagement from the
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 03:53 PM by pinto
deadly chaos that is Iraq. I liked that he called out the Administration to fish or cut bait, in so many words. If Iraq stands on its own, it stands on its own. We need to support that by withdrawing our troops.

I realize there is and always will be the IWR hanging over this Senator's head, as well as the whole Senate. But today Kerry did a great job, imo, focusing the issue on what we do now.

There's a (R) rebuttal now. He's whining about Kerry's statements as a "political ploy". Duh. Anytime you hear that it means the speaker is on the defensive and has no answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He has already said he was wrong
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 04:00 PM by politicasista
but it's more fun for people to blame dems for voting for the IWR and let Bush off the hook, when he would have invaded without it.




This is Bush's war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Good to hear. Thanks for the details
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Six months ahead, six months behind
Actually, he is rather far behind on the whole calling Bush out thing.

Such fire and brimstone would've been helpful during the election.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC