Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hate to admit this but Rumsfeld knows about "Appeasers"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:08 AM
Original message
I hate to admit this but Rumsfeld knows about "Appeasers"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Rape rooms, schmape rooms. When are you going to gas the Iranians?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. today's palm beach post (opinion section) had an article
about this. if i can find it i will post a link but they don't usually post articles to the 'net until the day after it runs in print.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wrote a long letter on Right Wing appeasement
I posted this on DU last week:

In recent comments to the American Legion, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld compared the more the nearly 2/3 of Americans who oppose the U.S. occupation of Iraq to those who appeased Hitler before World War 2. If you look at reality, however, it is neoconservatives like Bush, Cheney, Lieberman and Rumsfeld that are truly appeasing the terrorists with their policies.

First, they ignored all the warnings about the dangers of Al-Qaeda prior to 9/11 to focus on the Star Wars boondoggle, while also having the FBI shift its focus from counter-terrorism to fighting pornography and drug-trafficking. Meanwhile, a Clinton-era plan to disrupt terrorist financing around the globe was killed soon after Team Bush took office, and the massive bipartisan Hart-Rudman report on terrorism collected dust in Condi Rice’s office.

Then, when terrorists struck our country on 9/11, we were told it was because Osama bin Laden hated the presence of US soldiers on the Arabian Peninsula, the most sacred Muslim holy land. In the months following 9/11, the Bush White House quietly cut and ran from Saudi Arabia, moving our troops out in compliance with Osama's decade-long dream.

To follow up on their Middle East appeasement, Team Bush later announced they were hightailing it out of the DMZ in South Korea not long after the loony leader of North Korea started rattling his saber about nuclear weapons. From Truman and Eisenhower, through Reagan and Clinton, every president had maintained a troop presence in this demilitarized zone until Kim Jong-Il had his wishes granted by George W. Bush.

Speaking of wishes, one of bin Laden’s greatest wishes was the overthrow of secular Muslim Saddam Hussein as leader of Iraq, and George Bush also fulfilled that one. It was just icing on the cake for Osama when Bush ordered the UN inspectors out of Iraq and invaded on the pretext of the urgent threat of WMD, shattering our nation’s international credibility and prestige. Not to mention, costing us over 2,600 lives and $300 billion, to date. The invasion and occupation has also proven to be a recruiting boon for Al-Qaeda.

Then, when one lone ambassador questioned the White House’s fabricated WMD claims, the response of Team Bush was to out the ambassador’s wife as a CIA spy, destroying her career as an agent tracking WMD, and also obliterating the usefulness of her CIA front company, Brewster-Jennings.

To make it a double whammy of agent outings, when they had to justify raising the terror alert during the 2004 Democratic convention, the Bush Administration served up the name Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan as justification. It turns out that Mr. Khan was a double agent working with Pakistan and Britain, whose cover was now blown.

With our current policy of submission to the demands of terrorists, it is no wonder that for the last three years the number of acts of terrorism around the globe has grown exponentially, shattering previous records.

And, the appeasement continues to this day, as not long before the recent liquid explosives on airplanes scare, it was the Bush Administration that tried to cut funding for detecting those very types of explosives. Combine that with our port security still being dangerously under funded, budget cutbacks at the prestigious CDC, first responders also suffering drastic cuts, loose nukes unaccounted for around the world, and so much more, I believe it is time to stop our policy of supplication to Al-Qaeda.

While Rumsfeld spoke of Europeans appeasing Hitler and Mussolini, it might be better if we turned an eye to our shores during that time, when many of that era’s Republicans, conservatives and business elites advocated alliance with the Nazis and the fascists. Some, like George Bush’s grandfather Prescott, went so far as to do extensive business with Hitler for years, even after Nazi Germany declared war on our country. Then, George H. W. Bush just followed his father by starting a business relationship with the bin Laden family, a relationship continued by George W. Bush.

We can talk about Don Rumsfeld’s delusional comments about the confused majority of Americans who want to appease terrorists, but the reality is that the rubber-stamp Republican Congress is just following the long standing Republican policy of appeasing tyrants and terrorists, from Hitler to Osama bin Laden. It is fitting that Stephen Colbert said, “Reality has a well-known liberal bias,” when speaking to President Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Jeff that is excellent
I had forgotten about the Saudi Arabia withdrawal.

The Mr.Khan episode oddly is never talked about anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. KHAAAAAAAN!
To quote James T. Kirk...

I haven't forgotten it because I remember reading so many articles right after 9/11 as to how difficult it was to infiltrate Al Qaeda... then, we have Khan, a guy who had infiltrated them and risen to become the #1 I/T guy for Al Qaeda and we blow his frackin' cover to justify a terror alert right around the 2004 DNC.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC