AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:15 PM
Original message |
Can Bush give Bolton another recess appt. since Lugar put it on hold? |
warrens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I don't think so...you only get one bite at the cookie |
|
He has a year to be confirmed. Otherwise, he's dead.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. thanks to both of you. |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I do not believe so.... |
|
A person can only, from my understanding, receive one recess appointment...
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. This also begs the question, how long can they keep postponing |
|
the confirmation process?
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
pat_k
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Yes. But they can't keep paying him -- kinda shameful to have to . . . |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 12:21 PM by pat_k
. . work for free because We the People are so opposed to him that not even the fascists and fascist dupes in Congress can get him hired.
|
Eugene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Yes he can, but Bolton won't receive a salary. |
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Oh, Bolton will get money alright. It just won't show up on the q |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 12:27 PM by no_hypocrisy
record, that's all.
|
mazzarro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-07-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
He will get salary from Halliburton, which in turn will get extra no-bid contracts.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message |