DU? Poll on 911 Conspiracy Theories???!!!! or does Path to 911

[jarnocan]

have it right? (I added the last part- but I sure don't accept BU**SH**Inc.s version)
Many try to lump them all together. Does not believing in the full BU**SH** story - thinking that they could have prevented it, the PNAC or ISI may have been involved, that John O'Neill's investigations were impeded, mean believing in every theory? Of course not, but I think there are many valid questions. I think the Bush administration benefits when the press generalizes about 'conspiracy theories'.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14727720/

"Yes. The government has left many questions unanswered about that day."

HELL yes, IMHO!

[Redstone]

1. Huh?

Redstone

[jarnocan]

6. HUH?

Just home from work- long day. What was your question?
http://www.st911.org/
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Exposing Falsehoods and Revealing Truths another interesting site.
http://www.st911.org/ the list of members is interesting, very diverse, but many very well educated professors in various fields.

[valerief]

2. 51% yes

Thanks.

Do you believe any of the conspiracy theories suggesting the U.S. government was somehow involved in 9/11? * 50127 responses
Yes. The government has left many questions unanswered about that day. 51%
No. These theories are absurd and disrespectful -- especially to those who lost their lives on 9/11. 43%
I'm not sure. 6.3%

[jarnocan]

3. so far...

Do you believe any of the conspiracy theories suggesting the U.S. government was somehow involved in 9/11? * 50013 responses

Yes. The government has left many questions unanswered about that day.
51%

No. These theories are absurd and disrespectful -- especially to those who lost their lives on 9/11.
43%

I'm not sure.
6.3%

[rzemanfl]

4. Even with the guilt factor of "disrespect for the dead" they can't

get a majority for "No."

[valerief]

5. good point. n/t

[jarnocan]

7. true majority action page for ABC's path to 911 bu**sh**

http://action.truemajority.org/campaign/dontdistort911/w6d68e7445bi5en?

Hey BTW doesn't it seem awful that they are using the late John O'Neill as part of this flick. I think Richard Clarke would be angered about that.