Kindigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 05:55 PM
Original message |
The Path to 911 Help me out folks |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 05:57 PM by dragndust
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=192243&messageID=675&numReps=12To all of you that are not in or have someone in the milatry. Do you know that Clinton had Bin Lauden in his sites and did NOT give any orders to do anything about it. All Presdents make mistakes but why is everyone so down on Bush. To each there own on watching the path to 9-11.
|
kerry-is-my-prez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Is this a joke or are you serious? |
Kindigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Iowans can use a little education, and I thought it would be a place peeps could go blow off a little steam. That's all.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. People thin that is YOUR sentiment there, not "Army wife" from the site nt |
jpak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 06:19 PM by jpak
To all of you that are not in or have someone in the milatry (sic). Do you know that Clinton had Bin Lauden (sic) in his sites (sic) and did NOT give any orders to do anything about it. All Presdents (sic) make mistakes but why is everyone so down on Bush. To each there (sic) own on watching the path to 9-11.
:rofl:
|
Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Here's a little edjumacation für Iowans... |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. but clinton didnt. it is consistantly said,there was never contact |
|
with bin laden, there was never the oppotunity to get him. it has been said consistantly. so please tell me where you get the information, besides a chat board.
also, people arent ragging about all the things bush DIDNT do prior to 9/11. we are bitching about a fake story, fiction, being told to the american people as factual. as a military family...... you too should have issue with lies being presented as truth.
|
JHB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. No, I din't know that, and for a good reason: Because it's not true. |
|
Bin Laden was never nice and neatly "in his sites" (sic). If you think differently, then explain exactly when that was. And stick around for the holes that get poked in your example.
People are "down on" Bush for a number of reasons, but the most pertinent here are: 1) Whateve you think Clinton's efforts on counterterrorism (or their inadequecy), the facts of the Bush administration's entire term prior to 9/11 (the speeches they made, the budgets they drew up, the policy directives they issued) was to REDUCE those efforts: reduce their priority, reduce their funding, reduce presonnel and material assets devoted to them. Whatever our chances of stopping the plot were under Clinton, they were WORSE under Bush.
2) On 9/11, we were attacked, and the entire world was behind us. But instead of seriously counterattacking the people who attacked us, they made only the most perfunctory effort at that, and instead milked the attack on us to advance a "wish list" of agenda items they wouldn't have been able get otherwise, including their plans to invade Iraq.
|
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
8. How's come Bush hasn't caught Osama bin Laden? He's had |
|
enough time don't ya think? 9-11 happened on Bush's watch, that's why I'm down on him!! Quit blaming President Clinton for something that happened 9 months into Bush's term.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message |