CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 07:35 PM
Original message |
| Re: MMoore's "F/9-11" release date |
|
wasn't it delayed several times due to Disney's bullshit and stalling?
If I remember correctly, he tried to get it released well in advance of the 2004 elections.
|
| Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Something about "Miramax" comes back to me nt |
| CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. the wingers are trying to say that Moore deliberately released |
|
the film close to the election, a la Disney.
|
| LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. yes Disney refused to distribute |
|
Lionsgate too over from them.
|
| rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. F9/11 was released on the Fourth of July in the US |
|
which is what Moore always wanted.
:headbang:
rocknation
|
| CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. And didn't Mike give Chimpolini a chance to respond |
|
to the movie prior to its release?
|
| Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-10-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. I recall that Michael Moore worked the Disney story for publicity |
|
Moore knew months ago that Disney-Miramax had backed out of distribution, but as the release date approached, he revisited the story to get a controversy in the press. It worked. Good for Michael Moore.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
