Just gotta say one thing to Disney/ABC after watching

[rateyes]

EAT SHIT!


I hope Clinton, Berger, and everyone else who has a case of libel against ABC/Disney files suit TOMORROW MORNING, holds a press conference, and shoves subpoenas right up ABC/Disney's, the director's, the producer's, the actors', and the "horse they rode in on's" ass!

FUCK THE MOUSE!!!!!

[Buckmaw]

1. What about M. Moore?

I guess if this happens then M. Moore should be worried... yes?

[evlbstrd]

2. What's he got to worry about?

He offered a reward to anyone who could find a lie in his film. So far, no takers.

[Junkdrawer]

3. If Mike committed libel, he would have been sued by now.

Mike told the truth.

[Balbus]

34. I don't think you want to use that as a basis of truth.

So by what you said, if there's no successful lawsuit brought against Disney/ABC then this show was all truth?

[Junkdrawer]

37. The OP asked if Mike Moore shouldn't be worried about libel. n/t

[Balbus]

45. And you said because he was never sued he must have told the truth?

Hence, if there is no lawsuit filed against ABC/Disney, then this documentary must be true?

[Junkdrawer]

51. No. I said two things:

1. If Mike were going to be sued, he would have been sued by now.

2. Mike told the truth.

I did not say the if there is no lawsuit, there is truth. Please do not put words in my mouth.

[Richard Steele]

4. Nope. I'ts not LIBEL when it's TRUE, you see.

[jazzjunkysue]

39. And when it's about a politician's political service.

Libel is when you make accusations about someone's personal life that do not pertain to their official work. Michael stayed on course. He hired several groups of unaffiliated experts to edit and re-edit the work and did not interfere.

No one can say that about this obimination.

[Connie_Corleone]

5. By using the Bush administration's own words??

Uh, no.

[babylonsister]

6. What ABOUT MM? He offered anyone lots of money if they

could find a non-truth in his documentary, and no one took him up on it because they couldn't. I don't see Disney/ABC offering the same thing. :eyes:

[Roland99]

7. 2 posts and bringing up Michael Moore?

Something tells me you're not long for these boards.

[Buckmaw]

??

I wasnt trying to get kicked out... and yes, not many posting...

However, I do enjoy reading what other post...

[MoonRiver]

32. You're just not a very experienced little troll are you?

And sadly you won't be around long enough to gain much more experience. :D

[tuvor]

8. Tell us everything you know.

Shouldn't take very long.

[glitch]

17. he just did. nt

[charlyvi]

20. LOL n/t

[Sydnie]

21. I think they just blew their wad with that post

That apears to BE everything that they know. :rofl:

[aquart]

9. Thank you for your concern.

And let me welcome you to DU.

Mr. Moore's defense is the truth. The Path to 9/11 perpetrators don't have that.

[charlyvi]

10. Um, no.

Moore's movies are documentaries; not "fictionalized" versions of real life events. He doesn't do docudramas. No one has sued him because they cannot deny what he shows in his films. He doesn't create fictionalized scenes and pass them off as truth. Big difference, yes?

[leftofthedial]

11. libel and defamation are lies

Moore told the truth.

[jab105]

12. I know troll, I know...but for entertainment value...

1. If you were going to see a Michael Moore movie, you KNEW what you were going to be seeing...
2. You had to PAY to see the MM movie
3. MM used scenes that actually happened, there were no actors making up scenes
4. MMs movie was not given out to school children to learn about the history behind 9/11
5. MM movie wasn't shown commercial free on a network channel
6. MM movie wasn't offered for free on itunes

I'm not a fan of Michael Moore, I didn't even like F9/11 but this bullshit that they were the same thing is just beyond logic, though you guys were never good at that to begin with huh?

[valerief]

13. Please explain your point. It's not clear. n/t

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

14. You have a captive audience. Please expound.

We're waiting agog.

:rofl:

[Lindacooks]

HAHAHAHAHAH!!!

Thanks for the laugh - I needed that.

:rofl:

[MoonRiver]

16. People who tell the truth don't have to worry.

But you wouldn't know about those people would you?

[Kingofalldems]

18. Ah---no

Tell us one lie in Michael Moore's movie.

[patrice]

19. Typical.

6-year old mind. "Whatever I/we did is okay, because Michael Moore did _____________."

[City Lights]

22. Or the ever reliable, "Clinton did it too." eom

[Sparkly]

42. Btw, if Michael Moore is supposed to be the left-wing Ann Coulter,

why isn't he a frequent "commentator" and subject of TV news all the time???

[patrice]

46. Oh but, "Americans can't handle that level of complexity."

We mustn't expect too much of our listeners and viewers.

[Sparkly]

48. Ah... So maybe if he just threatens violence against people,

expresses intolerance for the majority of Americans, and insults most of the world, then he could be as welcome and popular as Ann is!

[blonndee]

23. Um, no.

But you already know this, dontcha?

[Buckmaw]

24. ?? :(

Why do yall hate me??

[patrice]

29. Why do you assume anyone who disagrees with you hates you?

Can you tell the difference between objective statement of fact and hate?

Claiming some behavior is acceptable because someone else "got away" with something they did is the thinking of a 6-year old. That's not hate; it's a statement of fact.

[Crunchy Frog]

52. Awww, I don't hate you.

I think you're adorable.

[Name removed]

25. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Buckmaw]

27. This makes me sad...

Wow... forget I said anything... Jees...

[MoonRiver]

28. I think it's past your bedtime sonny.

You're getting a little cranky there. :eyes:

[Crunchy Frog]

56. Diaper needs changing I think.

[Individualist]

38. Well, boo damn hoo

Cry me a river.

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

43. We've ALL invited you to debate the point you tried to make

...instead, all you've come back with is masturdebation.

:evilgrin:

[MoonRiver]

47. I think FR sent over a junior troll cause the big bullies are all ascared

of us bad ass DUers. :D

[Sparkly]

49. Are you saying there are "big bullies" on FR?

Silly you!! They're ALL "juniors!"

[Richard Steele]

58. I think they're all "Top Number 3's", aren't they?

Or am I confusing them with a different
group of insane conservative cultists?

[Richard Steele]

50. I'd be willing to, but you haven't actually SAID anything yet.

Despite repeated requests, I might add.

[NMMNG]

31. Mmmmm, smells like pizza

I'll have mine with banana peppers and mushrooms please. :9

[ClusterFreak]

35. Ruh-oh...

:wow:

[Sparkly]

36. What about M. Graham, M. Washington, and Groucho M.?

Just trying for my own non-sequitors....

[stevedeshazer]

40. Nice try.

[CarlVK]

41. No, because he told the truth.

God help you if you don't know the difference.

[Crunchy Frog]

44. Ooh! A troll, a troll!

And I got to reply to it before it got tombstoned. :rofl:

[CarlVK]

55. Nice job.

[SoCalDem]

54. Um. when it's YOU , on camera as you say the stuff, it's

pretty hard to libel YOURSELF :rofl:

MM did not hire "actors" ..he didn;t have to.. The originals were too good to pass on ..:)

[MichaelHarris]

57. Hey

look, it's a dust bunny.

[gordianot]

15. The amazing part is they did it with a movie that is unwatchable.

If you are going to smear someone, commit libel, alienate an entire political party do it with some cinematic competence.

This movie is pure crap on many levels it is and was unwatchable and does not effectively deliver any message. Disney/ABC was willing to completely ruin their reputation with this?

[Rosemary2205]

53. I agree, the movie is awful.

The story line was hard to follow, the editing was terrible, the sound quality made it difficult to understand what was being said at critical times in the plot. Forget whether it's factual or not, the movie stinks even as a work of fiction.

[AndyA]

26. If a good Judge gets their hands on this tomorrow, Part 2 might not be

aired tomorrow night. They can prevent ABC from airing it if they want to.

I hope the shit really hits the fan tomorrow, and all the Kool-Aid drinkers will have to wait months, if ever, to see Part 2. They won't know what happened until it airs, because reality only exists on TV, right? :eyes:

[kerry-is-my-prez]

30. Saw some rw website that claims that Pt.2 has some criticism of Bush

http://patterico.com/category/political-correctness/

“The Path to 9/11″ absolutely slams Bush in a number of ways:


1. It depicts Condi Rice ignoring Richard Clarke’s advice about Al-Queda and undercutting his authority within the White House.

2. It depicts the August 6th “Presidential Daily Briefing” wherein Rice is explicitly warned before 9/11 that Bin Laden intends to hijack American airplanes.

3. It makes Richard Clarke look like a tragic hero (even though everyone knows that he later went on to become one of Bush’s biggest critics).

4. It contains an epliogue that cites 9/11 Commission members giving the current government a failing grade in implementing their recommendations.

Few people have seen the whole film. Even the select group in Washington only got to see the first half of the film (which obviously doesn’t deal with the Bush administration, based on how the timeline worked). As a result, there is a lot of misinformation going on about what “The Path To 9/11″ is really about.

[Dem2theMax]

33. Part two isn't going to be shown in the San Diego area.

At least not on Dish. We are getting Chargers football instead!
(And from what I can imagine, they won't DARE interrupt the game for *'s speech!) Tee hee hee!

[rasputin1952]

59. Locking

Well over half this thread is in attack mode.

I understand that emotions are running high, but we do not wish to see the site burn down in a flamefest.

Thank you for your understanding.