Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: More Americans blame Bush for 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:44 AM
Original message
Poll: More Americans blame Bush for 9/11
Poll: More Americans blame Bush for 9/11
POSTED: 8:26 a.m. EDT, September 11, 2006

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington has risen from almost a third to almost half over the past four years, a CNN poll released Monday found.

Asked whether they blame the Bush administration for the attacks, 45 percent said either a "great deal" or a "moderate amount," up from 32 percent in a June 2002 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/11/911.poll/index.html?section=cnn_topstories&eref=yahoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dangerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I always knew...
Bush AND bin Laden are behind this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting. Sounds like 9-11 is slowly turning into a liability, rather
Edited on Mon Sep-11-06 10:49 AM by Marr
than an asset for the Bush Administration. What will they talk about if they can't talk about 9-11...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. where the eff is osama bin laden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. We could have and should have made it so long ago.
It was a liability from the get go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. There is a real disconnect
between what the people believe and what Democratic leaders are willing to say. There always is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. It Was Inevitable
It DID happen on Silverspoon's watch.

He is a very unpopular president with low personal likeability numbers.

He has high profile underlings with even lower likeability.

Nothing they are doing is working worth a darn, and it sure isn't meeting the expectations for success that they promised.

They tried to hang this on the Clinton's who had HIGH likeability and an approval rating in the 70's during impeachment.

The american people were bound to come around (except the 25% radical buffoons) that would make blaming a popular president a tough sell for a far less popular one. And, one of them is self-made, rose up from poverty and worked his butt off. The other was a slacker and a lazy punk and never worked a day in his life.

I think it might have been far better for them to have taken the heat and never tried to blame Clinton. Somehow or other, they convinced themselves that Clinton "got impeached" so the people hate him as much as they do.

Of course, the attacks of 9/11 were based upon a similar miscalculation on the part of Al Qaeda, that with Silverspoon in office, the rest of the world hated the United States as much as they did. Both groups of gangsters, al Qaeda and the Bush Mob, were of course, wrong.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Excellent analysis, professor.
I would just add that Bush himself is too dim for even Rove to overcome as a liability. Bush simply does not have enough smarts to handle himself without a script. His foot-in-mouth episodes are now gaining more attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. 8/6/01 USA Today Poll
Poll finds most are put off by Bush vacation

CRAWFORD, Texas — Taking a 30-day working vacation at his ranch after six months in office, President Bush is spending too much time away from the White House, according to a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll.

In the poll, which was released Monday, 55% said Bush is taking too much time off. Not that this is a full-fledged vacation, Bush aides insist.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/august01/2001-08-06-bush-vacation.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. I bet those numbers rise after ABC/Disney's Path to 9/11
The propaganda is pretty blatant, and everybody, even the backwash, may start wonder why it is necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not given the ratings of the program.
They got beat out by football and the Simpsons. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Lol! True, though you don't have to watch it to wonder why they needed to
produce it. Even the politically unaware might start to wonder... but liars never know when to let their lies alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I agree. It's major impact so far seems to be
that it's made "who's to blame for 9-11?" part of the mainstream discussion. Those far-right myths about the Clinton Administration don't stand up to the light of real examination. They've invited their myths to be debunked on television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I hope it outrages enough of the few remaining reality-based on television
to come out with their debunkings in strong, unequivocal statements now. No pussyfooting, it is long overdue time to call the liars "LIARS".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bush-bin Laden
A socially dysfunctional, co-enabling couple. Who benefits from the GWOT? Bush-bin Laden. Both have a vested interest in seeing terrorism spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wait until the real bombshells
of the phase two report. I hope they're preparing the indictment for Roberts right now as a co-conspirator to obstruct justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. What phase two report? Do you have a good link to a MSM news story
about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. There are so many. Here's just a brief overview.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060907/ap_on_go_co/iraq_report


Phase 2 has five parts. They finally forced the republicans to release the first two, which showed bush lied about the intelligence.

The three that have been stonewalled by Roberts will show how Bush manipulated the intelligence. That's where the real bombshells are and Roberts is doing everything in his power to prevent it from being investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. about fucking time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. MSNBC poll says 59%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. nice, but an internet poll is not dependable since now I can go and
vote and others who see it can go and vote and some people may even be able to rig a way to vote twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. People seeing it and voting doesn't make it undependable
After all, the point of the poll is to have people vote on it.

And it's not trivial to find a way to have your vote counted more than once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC