Yavin4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 03:16 PM
Original message |
Why Would Masood Need Permission from Clinton to Kill Bin Laden |
|
Randi Rhodes just made a fantastic point. Masood would not have needed permission from Clinton. He would have just killed him without haste. Great point.
|
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That didn't make sense to us either....dah! nt |
kimmerspixelated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Did anyone else notice that on the Path movie they printed USAMA instead of Osama. I have assumed the "O" is the correct beginning. Maybe I'm wrong. If they are wrong, it just proves how really cheaply the movie was done.
|
RamboLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. No Richard Clarke actually referred to him as UBL |
|
or Usama bin-Laden. That was consistent in his book. Maybe it was just a different spelling.
|
sentelle
(659 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I guess it all depends |
|
On what he needs the US for? Equipment perhaps? Money? If either are the case and he doesn't get permission, stuff might dry up.
As for the UBL/OBL thing, remember that his name is printed in arabic not latin characters, and that kind of transliteration is an art, not a science.
|
razors edge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. USAma didn't look good to |
|
the party who funded him for so long.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |