aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:18 AM
Original message |
San Diego's ABC ran football instead of Path to 9/11 part 2???? |
|
My sister just told me that. They are going to air it, but on a Saturday night.
Does anyone know why? Did she mistake the channel? Did any other locale do this?
|
pitohui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message |
1. maybe because it's monday night and there's a football game? |
|
i don't know, i don't see teevee but i'll keep you bumped for a moment so you can get a more intelligent answer
would you put your movie aga. monday nite football if you wanted anyone to watch it?
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. You are so asking the wrong person. |
|
So it's that simple: They have a contract for Monday Night Football? Then why not air Part 2 on Tuesday?
|
Dem2theMax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:28 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Even though ESPN was showing the game, |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 01:38 AM by Dem2theMax
the local station got the game as well, since the San Diego Chargers were playing. And nope, your sis didn't get the channel wrong. I've been checking the listings to see if part two was going to be shown later in the week, but only did a search through Friday. I'll have to check on Saturday now.
As for other locals, Oakland/San Francisco would be involved, since they played the Raiders. But the game could have been blacked out up there, depending on their local football rules.
Edited to add: OK, just checked. Part two will be shown Saturday at 9pm. Good. People don't watch TV on Saturday night. They go out. Bad move on ABC's part. Hehehe.
Edited again to add: And they CAN'T show part two on Tuesday. That's when ABC's all important show, "Dancing with the Stars" previews (with Jerry Springer! LOL.) They don't want to mess with "Dancing." :crazy: I'm glad it's going to be on on Saturday night. Like I said, less viewers. :)
|
RamboLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
In Pittsburgh when the Steelers are on ESPN the ABC affiliate runs the game with the ESPN feed. I believe it is a rule from the NFL. Any soldout game for the home team and always for the visiting team has to be televised. Since not all people have cable I believe it also has to be broadcast on an over the airwaves local station.
|
lindisfarne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:38 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Maybe they figured more people would watch football - surprising given |
|
conservative majority in San Diego though.
|
pitohui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. i think poster #4 ramboliberal has it right |
|
again no teevee expert here but i'm pretty sure that's the way it goes around here anyways
|
nosmokes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 02:41 AM
Response to Original message |
7. makes sense $$ wise. chargers vs their arch rival the raiders who they |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 02:45 AM by nosmokes
whipped like a redheaded stepchild. WHOOP! go bolts!
on edit - and if the local ABC affiliate has the contract to air the chargers games that's gonna pre-empt anything else or they're at danger of severe finsncial penalties and losing the lucrative chargers contract to another station.
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 02:47 AM
Response to Original message |
8. They were contractually obligated to broadcast the game |
|
NFL rules, ect.
What would be really interesting would be to see the San Diego ratings vs other markets that aired the 911 thing.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |