Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matt Lauer's interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
nosferaustin Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:12 AM
Original message
Matt Lauer's interview
Twice, in this interview and over and over and over again, this bastard that is posing as our president has said that his job is to protect us. I'm sick of it.

I've said this before and I will say this again, over and over and over again, he is wrong!

The president takes an oath of office:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Defend the fucking Constitution, George, it and only it will defend us!

Lying piece of shit bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. And I'm sure that lightweight Matt Lauer...
...co-anchor for the "Today" show, an infotainment program masquerading as a news program, took the President to task for his comments?? I don't even pay attention anymore when weenies such as Lauer interview politicians. It's always the same, deferring and "sucking up" to those in power. It's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe you should pay attention.
Because you are wrong about this interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. NotGonna, you obviously haven't watched the interview
Bush was provoked by Lauer's questions; almost to the point of violence.



On a lighter note:




President Bush took time out of his busy schedule to address a matter of national security, Matt Lauer's abs. Bush must have rushed to the newsstand to pick up People Magazine to check out our exclusive pictures of Lauer's ripped bod that were so well hidden that not even the CIA, FBI, NSA, or even the Office of Homeland Security knew what Lauer has kept hidden under all those suits over the years.

http://splashnewsonline.blogspot.com/2006/09/even-george-w-bush-checks-out-splash.html


lol...described as another Bush homoerotic moment on the Stephanie Miller Show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I admit, I didn't watch the interview...
...I haven't watched "Today" in quite some time, since I find it overall full of lightweight fluff. Do you have a link to this interview??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosferaustin Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. a little wrong
Matt was actually a little ballsy on this one, for a change. Most of our "journalist" today are sheep, but maybe the herd will move in this direction and start calling this administration to task. Late, for sure, too late? I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't you get the email from Yoo?
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 09:30 AM by HereSince1628
The Declaration of Independence lists "protect" first among the objectives of a new nation.

Of course, R's don't usually consider the DI as a binding document as it is pre-Constitutional government, but when its quaint phrases are handy, well, sometimes you just can't ignore them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. The Declaration of Independence is the
preamble to the Constitution. It is not part of the Constitution. Bush stepes all over that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Let's get the facts and terms straight, people
THIS is the "Preamble" to the US Constitution:
http://www.constitutioncenter.org/explore/TheU.S.Constitution/index.shtml

Preamble:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

A "Preamble" is analagous to a "mission statement" and this "Preamble" is the first part of the US Constitution.

Maybe you meant to say that the Declaration of Independence, written in 1776, was a "precursor" to the US Constitution, written in 1789.

You are partly right in that Bush trampling the Declaration of Independence and all that it stands for, but it may be time for a new Declaration of Independence by "We the People" from this corrupt and despotic Administration. The Declaration is a statement that empowers "We the People" to throw off the shackles of a government that becomes corrupt and no longer serves the people.

http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/declaration_transcript.html

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. LIHOP: Liar In High Office--President
Lying Is His Official Policy
Lying Is His Only Protection
Lying Is His Obvious Predilection/Pastime/Pursuit/Purpose
Lying Is His Official Position
Lying Is His Operating Procedure
Lying Is His Only/Obvious Plan






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. I saw a good part of the interview on KO last night---Laurer was NOT hard-
balling * but * was whiny and belligerent anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. MSNBC video link for 11:27 interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC