Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

8/17 BUSH ("F-You, USA. Congress & Constitution!") Signing Statement:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 02:43 PM
Original message
8/17 BUSH ("F-You, USA. Congress & Constitution!") Signing Statement:
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 02:43 PM by elehhhhna

Statement on Signing the Pension Protection Act of 2006

August 17, 2006

Today I have signed into law H.R. 4, the ``Pension Protection Act of
2006.'' This legislation strengthens the pension insurance system and
ensures that workers will receive better information about their pension
plans. The legislation makes permanent the deductible limits for
contributions to Individual Retirement Accounts and 401(k) plans,
encourages employers to automatically enroll workers in 401(k) plans,
and expands workers' access to investment advice.

The executive branch shall construe sections 221(a) and 1632(b)(1)
of the Act, which call for the submission of legislative recommendations
to the Congress, in a manner consistent with the constitutional
authority of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch and
to recommend for the consideration of the Congress such measures as the
President shall judge necessary and expedient.

Section 1634(e) purports to require the United States Trade
Representative to submit to congressional committees the contents of the
negotiating positions of the United States and foreign countries in
certain international trade negotiations. The executive branch shall
construe section 1634(e) in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to conduct the Nation's foreign affairs including negotiations with foreign countries, supervise the unitary executive branch, and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations,
national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the
performance of the Executive's constitutional duties.
George W. Bush



http://frwebgate4.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=09001417538+12+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh he do surely love that Unitary Executive Branch, don't he?
That little "authority of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch" crops up everywhere these days. I don't know why Congress bothers to pass legislation, considering the UEB will do what the hell it likes anyway. It's amazing that Busholini isn't even content to follow the laws of a supine GOP Congress, but has to gather yet more power to himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. What the hell?
"Section 1634(e) purports to require the United States Trade
Representative to submit to congressional committees the contents of the
negotiating positions of the United States and foreign countries in
certain international trade negotiations. The executive branch shall
construe section 1634(e) in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to conduct the Nation's foreign affairs including negotiations with foreign countries, supervise the unitary executive branch, and to withhold information the disclosure of which could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the
performance of the Executive's constitutional duties.
George W. Bush"

So CONGRESS DOING ITS JOB IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL???????
WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. its just a god damned piece of paper!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "purports to require..." my foot. It REQUIRES, George. It REQUIRES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC