AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:19 PM
Original message |
Stingrays Responsible for 9/11 |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 04:23 PM by AtomicKitten
|
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Hey, Even Mods Make Mistakes. Go Easy On 'Em. Is Pretty Funny Though LOL |
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The stingrays hate us for our freedom! |
|
...or our legs. Not sure which one.:rofl:
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It was Bill Clinton's fault. |
|
He was too soft on stingrays. Now we have to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here.
|
Cessna Invesco Palin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I guess that makes Steve Irwin the Richard Clarke of stingrays... |
Human Torch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Looks like the people who cried "TINFOIL HAT" will be eating some CROW. |
|
I think what bothers me most is the sheer volume of intelligence the FBI had accumulated on stingrays learning to fly commercial aircraft, but NOT TO LAND.
I blame Bill Clinton.
:evilgrin:
:toast:
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. it was Bill Clinton's penis, not a stingray barb |
Cessna Invesco Palin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-12-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You're obviously a government psy-op plant. |
|
You obviously haven't done your research! How can you possibly believe that planes destroyed the WTC when there is irrefutable evidence that only flying stingrays have the necessary physical properties to melt structural steel! You must be some kind of crazy Admin disinfo operative.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message |