|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:38 PM Original message |
WH responds to the Time/Washingtonian revelation re: Bush & Abramoff pics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. But didn't the dimbulb president say he didn't know him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. The White House has zero credibility, and everyone knows it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. What bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Holding out for the bucks, is my vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. Did they comment on Abramoff's ability to arrange meetings with Shrub? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. So, Where ARE These Pics? I Want To See Them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kikiek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. According to Abramoff they were friendly. They cut part of the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Okay, okay, Abramoff was here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 09:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. It's good to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. If they issue a denial on Sunday, you know they're pissed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Geez. Is "outrageous wrongdoing" the euphemism du jour for felony? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
f-bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
12. Caught you George and now it's time for impeachment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-22-06 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. How many of those tens of thousands were with Pioneers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC