Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So tell me, what will stop the shrub from saying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:24 PM
Original message
So tell me, what will stop the shrub from saying
"Ya know, we're right in the middle of this War On Terra thingy and I just can't see myself leaving the White House."

With all this Unitary Executive theory talk, what will keep these fascists from trying to repeal the 22nd amendment?

We know what the Dickweed in Chief thinks about congress, what if he just tells them all to "Fuck off, you can't impeach me, and I ain't leaving in '08." With Alito on the SCOTUS and that crazy interpretation of executive powers, dick weed can do whatever the fuck he wants and can stay however long he wants.

I don't think this is crazy talk. Is it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigjohn16 Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. We will. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. here's the bad part. Lazy America would passively accept.
it's incrementalism at it's worst. Few of us have exercised ourselves regarding the idea of saving our liberty and protecting democratic institutions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. They won't be able to repeal the amendment.
Chimp will leave in January of 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PWRinNY Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I bet he's gone before then.
He can't hack it. He can't hack anything but the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. but what bothers me is this
unitary executive crap. Coupled with the Patriot Act, it sounds like the neo-cons want to give what is equivilent to Nazi Germany's Emergency Powers Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yes, that is troubling.
The only way I think he can stay in there longer than his term is if another "attack" occurs in country or perhaps multiple attacks over a short period of time. Something that would give them the go ahead to declare martial law or what not. How they would enforce it I don't know. I think it more likely that they just keep stealing the elections until the "people" decide dictatorship is what they want. They are following a long term plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Only one thing:
The fact that he is just a figurehead, a puppet.
"THEY" have no intention of ever leaving,
but they WILL replace their trained monkeys every 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. "what will keep these fascists from trying to repeal the 22nd amendment?"
The ratification process will keep that from happening, but I CAN see a scenario where the elections are postponed indefinitely due to terror, terror, terror! or possibly a MIHOP event. How that will go down with the People I do not know, but I think they are loony enough to try it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Clinton.
If they repeal the 22nd amendment.. then we will have President Bill Clinton.

That's the only thing giving the Pukes pause..... and it would be their worst nightmare.
The mere thought of that makes me laugh out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What will keep them from repealing it is their own thirst for....
the office...either directly as a candidate or indirectly in their support for a crony who will reward them for clearing the way.....won't happen...that's the good thing about these greedy bastards...eventually they will eat themselves....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. 22nd amendment
Nothing stops people from trying pass another amendment to overture the 22nd amendment - just like happened with prohibition. The chance of it actually happening is probably slim to none. The 22nd amendment was aimed directly at FDR and I imagine his dying in office had a lot to do with the public being willing to let it pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-22-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ain't Gonna Happen.
It would be an issue that would galvanize BOTH sides fighting for the same goal. Republicans would never allow that to stand, no matter how much we think they support the shrub. Fact is, there are many republicans who want their shot at power. No way in hell they would sit idly by while * forced his way to remain in the seat and took away their shot.

Ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC