Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gen Micheal Hayden, on C-SPAN, giving EXCUSES for the NSA spying!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:05 AM
Original message
Gen Micheal Hayden, on C-SPAN, giving EXCUSES for the NSA spying!
He's on NOW! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. C-SPAN LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Do you wish you had his job?
He seems to think we all do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. C-Span has been in full spin mode lately.
Since Jan. 1, C-Span has had a decidedly conservative bent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's explaining, LIVE, why being spied on is a GOOD thing.
:eyes: This shit is going to backfire, BIG TIME! No one wants to be spied on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Oh yes
Being paranoid is a nice dream of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. Power... and secrecy.... Powerful in its capabilities and secretive in its
interests......

The ONLY way the NSA can TARGET people is by spying on ALL communications and then data-mining the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Maybe the question is, SHOULD THE NSA be SPYING ON US... at all
After watching Enemy of the State this weekend, I got to thinking that Bush was just using something that was already out there, and apparently NSA isn't constrained by avoiding spying on Americans. I think they should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. They're keeping us SAFE by spying on us. Oh, I feel better now!
Don't you? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. Spying on us and still they haven't caught Osama.
:yoiks: Maybe they are wasting their time spying on 'Mericans, when they should be out looking for George's bestest bud. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
42. "Easily within my power" by Executive order 12333 signed in 1981
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. But you'll never notice it - check this thread!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL.... I "SEE!"
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if he'll mention the Quakers in FL. or the Peace activist? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. So this cowboy thinks he's all that stands between us
and the great abyss.

Guys like this creep me out. Take their toys away from them. If we didn't have characters like this in every nation, perhaps the world would stand a chance at peace. Instead, we have swaggerers like this man who see shadows and threat everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. "inadvertent collection" (emails, calls) never read
trust us

And also, I have a bridge in Brooklyn....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's pretending terrorism started on 9/11.
Using Bush's "two different worlds" before and after 9/11 meme. I haven't heard him or anybody else come up with a legitimate excuse for circumventing FISA oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Is he also pretending they started spying after 9/11
because that is an L I E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
51. Wah! Wah! 9/11 Commission criticized the NSA's ability to even collect
good information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Of course, he would never lie...
Why would anyone think such a thing??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. His mouth is moving? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
53. "Inadvertent Collection" on US citizens
expunged IF......

But who has oversight of this program?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. What a smug turd
I feel like I'm in kindergarten class. This man is scaring me. :scared: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. And the smugger Rumsfeld is claiming that he "defers"
to top generals in these matters in the crawl, no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Yep, kindergarten class.
Look kiddies, the NSA is good for you, the NSA loves you, the NSA just wants to protect you from the bad guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
45. What a WHINER "I feel like I have to stand up here and explain"
boo-hooo

You do, ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. WAYNE MADSEN!!!! Question. LOL!!!!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. I guess they've invented new words to go between 'legal' and 'illegal'
'sorta' legal? 'quasi' legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. He admits they did not go to FISA?
Did you not break the law? He blames the Attorney General !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. he insists he has 2 paths, both legal: one involves warrants, one not!
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 10:44 AM by librechik
yeah, he's been told it's legal, so stop yer whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. He was asked if what they're doing is legal? He refused to answer.
He said the JD would have to answer that? LOL!!! They broke the law and know they broke the law. This guy is a LOSER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. Eewwww where are da WABBITS?
Sorry couldn't resist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
50. Have to wonder if Jon Voight was cast after looking at Hayden
for "Enemy of the State"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. Caught the last 20 minutes of that on Saturday
Born on 9/11/40 huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Trying to reassure everyone that they aren't interested
in any communications beyond those for AQ. Tell that to the Quaker group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. The book "State of War" says Hayden was upset after "Enemy of the State"
came out and went on a PR stump to reassure people they weren't getting spied upon. He didn't like the idea that people would think the NSA was big, bad, etc.

Looks like he's back on the PR stump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
25. "I'm part of the faith community too" ??? (he says to a black minister)
saying they are frightened about domestic spying

Military Theocracy?? ah, jeez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. "It's focused. It's targeted. You shouldn't worry."
That's what the man said. I repeat, tell that to the Quaker group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. only the president's enemies need to worry
"this is not a drift net" yeah, I bet--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. and the grannies and the peace moms. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
29. Who's in the audience? Is that Bamford?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. This guy is AWESOME! Challenging the General to a debate! LOL!
Me thinks the General was PISSED OFF. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. he ignores the question about targeting the political foes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
34. "Are you targeting opponants of the Bush regime"?
refused to answer!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArmchairMeme Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
35. Q & A
Are you targeting specific groups opposed to Bush? No answer
Are you assuming the power to wiretap under the alleged unitary powers of the president? Twitching over and over. Might defer this to lawyers - we are doing this within the law.

A lot of good questions are being asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
37. this is so weird
if this is supposed to be the first shot in the offensive supporting bush's spying,

it isn't going too well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #37
52. Good point...
Think of how well Gonzalez will do tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
39. This needs to stop. Start slamming Congress.
Investigations now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
41. This is such a mistake. This tape will wind up in a courtroom
as evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
43. Why did he just say
the FISA court had to have all the information in front of them to make a decision, and that it takes a long time to fill out the paperwork?

I thought they could go ahead with surveillance, and get a FISA warrant afterward?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. That also contradicts what he said about having all this power since 1981
with Executive order 12333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. They CAN get the warrants AFTER THE FACT. Their excuses don't hold water.
They were spying ILLEGALLY and that is why they didn't go to FISA. They are so screwed. This is backfiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
46. he denied that Al-Queda was even planning an attack in US prior to 9/11
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 11:26 AM by phoebe
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&startpos=1500#a101702hayden

snip

NSA Director Michael Hayden testifies before the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry that the “NSA had no that al-Qaeda was specifically targeting New York and Washington ... or even that it was planning an attack on US soil.” Before 9/11, the “NSA had no knowledge ... that any of the attackers were in the United States.” Supposedly, a post-9/11 NSA review found no intercepts of calls involving any of the 19 hijackers. Yet, in the summer of 2001 (see Summer 2001), the NSA intercepted communications between Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and hijacker Mohamed Atta, when he was in charge of operations in the US. What was said between the two has not been revealed. The NSA also intercepted multiple phone calls from Abu Zubaida, bin Laden's chief of operations, to the US in the days before 9/11 (see Early September 2001). But who was called or what was said has not been revealed.



on edit - rather odd that these "new" rules to wiretap were supposedly put in place b4 9/11 and yet he denied that the NSA had picked up any vital information on the terrorists prior to 9/11..when in fact, NSA had..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
48. Bamford is in line for questions!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
49. Trust us. Would we lie?
We don't need no stinking oversight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
55. Knight Ridder reporter.
They must have "probable cause" for warrant...detour around FISA via "reasonable belief" instead. The General is trying to say what they have been doing is "reasonable" and it's the "Constitutional standard." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
56. Can someone with access to teevee media let us know
how this is relayed to the public via the broadcast media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC