Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate To Investigate Administration Coercion of Military Lawyers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:19 AM
Original message
Senate To Investigate Administration Coercion of Military Lawyers
Senate To Investigate Administration Coercion of Military Lawyers

Last week, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) alleged that the U.S. military’s top uniformed lawyers were pressured by the administration for more than five hours to “sign a prepared statement” supporting the President’s proposal for military tribunals. Today on CBS’s Face The Nation, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) announced that he plans to hold a hearing investigating the incident. The JAG lawyers would be called as witnesses.

VIDEO AND TRANSCRIPT:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/17/senate-jag-investigate/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. As glad as I am to hear this
...Graham & Spector are as responsible as anyone else in allowing the idiot king to gain the power that he has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. They *held them* for FIVE (5x) Hours ... DAMN THEM!
The Executive Branch is truly demented and drunk on delusions of being "all powerful." Despite what the whorish M$M tells you, The Executive Branch considers itself RULERS. They dismiss both The Supreme Court and The Legislative Branch. They need to be de-fanged immediately! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Senate to Investigate"....is this a Robin Williams comedy bit?
I rather doubt that the Senate will spend 30 seconds on this issue, and that may be generous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, sure
I've about had it up to HERE with Specter's announcements that he's going to DO something about BushCo's crimes. What was it Cafferty called him? I think it was "gutless Republican worm." Feh.

Wait and see. After Specter's through, there'll be a "tough new standard" that the White House can only arm-twist for five hours but not a moment longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. So did they finally sign it?
If the JAG lawyers fell under the pressure, they're sure not the kid of attorneys I know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It was my understanding that they did sign, but only
after it was edited a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm wondering if what Bush did was illegal
Bush didn't quite say that under his orders interrogators were asked to break the law. Bush did say that interrogators would refuse to follow orders if the interrogators weren't sure the orders were lawful. Bush never once said that he himself would stop the program from going forward based on its illegality. It sounded like Bush was trying to keep the illegal program going and people underneath him refused.

I'm wondering if ordering somebody to commit a crime is a crime in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC