Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Eyes Plame-Niger Conspiracy - By Jason Leopold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 12:30 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald Eyes Plame-Niger Conspiracy - By Jason Leopold
Fitzgerald Eyes Plame-Niger Conspiracy
Submitted by davidswanson on Mon, 2006-01-23 12:19. Media
Prosecutor Probing Niger Forgeries, Possible Conspiracy in CIA Leak
By Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | www.truthout.org

"There was a discussion about what to do about Mr. Wilson," the current State Department official said. "There was a decision to leak a story to the press - I think a few journalists - about the Wilson trip, that it was a non-issue because his wife set it up for him."

Over the past few months, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has been questioning witnesses in the CIA leak case about the origins of the disputed Niger documents referenced in President Bush's January 2003 State of the Union address, according to several current and former State Department officials who have testified in the case.

The State Department officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because some of the information they discussed is still classified, indicated that the White House had substantial motive for revealing undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity to reporters.

They said the questions Fitzgerald asked them about the Niger documents suggested to them that the special prosecutor was putting together a timeline. They said they believe Fitzgerald wants to show the grand jury how some people in the Bush administration may have conspired to retaliate against former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, an outspoken critic of the administration's pre-war Iraq intelligence.

lots more:http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/7014
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R!
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Tsunami is coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Go Fitz!!!!!!!
Go! Go! Go!!!

Expose ALL of these liars, thieves and crooks!

GO FITZ!

:kick: and recommended!!! :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Spitzer/Fitzgerald 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Now THAT would be a ticket!
We'd have this whole country cleaned up in no time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
68. That would just get them assassinated, I'm afraid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. Hell yeah.
Just got to make sure he doesn't get on any airplanes now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toymachines Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #44
57. what would happen if he got "hit"?
How much would that suck. And I am sure there would be no recourse to take, no one held responsible, and pieces of the case left to pick up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #44
62. definitly kick this baby for a while!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
61. OMG
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh Oh Oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ready the fan and stand back... K & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Erm...
He posted the After Downing Street link to the story at the bottom:

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/7014

It wasn't the truthout link, but it was the same story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I saw it -- what's the point of not posting the truthout link
in addition or instead -- why the fuck BOTHER if you just want to direct people to ADS ? Is it originally a AfterDowningStreet article, or a Truthout article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. chill out
If you want something posted a certain way, do it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Decaf, my friend.
Decaf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks so much, kpete.
I hope Fitzgerald stays on this until he has enough to bring the whole mess down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Me too
I am anxious but I definitely want him to do a great job and be confident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Wow.
:wow: Personal issues? :shrug:

Anyway, I appreciate the encouraging OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Double Wow.
Maybe a switch to decaf is in order?

I appreciate the encouraging OP, too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Triple Wow n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Kicked-recommended!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. So sorry
I try every day to give it my best shot. You have to admit I am getting better. Thanks again for the reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Holy shit kpete - you messed up after about a brazillion posts
Like Wesley Snipes said in White Men Can't Jump - "well I guess the sun shines on a dog's ass evey once in a while" -In this case I would say the opposite has happened.

As always thanks for the heads up and workhorse mentality that you adhere to keep DU in the loop.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. This will have to be your last apology -
From now on we want to see you stand up for your right to screw up - we're Americans for crying out loud, it's embarassing.

And killer post! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. I will try to NEVER APOLOGIZE AGAIN...
Thanks, that felt good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blossomstar Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. great post! Thank you. I'll bet that guy is a LOVABLE old fart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. You're a class act kpete. Thanks for all you do to keep us informed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. One of the DUers
that I appreciate the most. I think kpete provides the DU community with outstanding work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope so...
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes! Fitz working to nail WHIG!
From the link:

The officials said Fitzgerald's interest is not in the the war's validity. Instead, Fitzgerald is trying to find out if Wilson's public questions about the administration's intelligence and its use of the Niger documents led members of a little known committee called the White House Iraq Group to leak Plame's name and CIA status to reporters.


Keep it up Fitz! Now just look into OSP and you'll really be cooking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. We're standing on one leg waiting.
We want Fitz to be thorough, but speedy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Definitely. Look how Leopold BURNS Rove.
From the link:

The current State Department official said the INR memo was discussed at length during the meeting Grossman attended at the White House. That meeting may have been the first time other White House officials, including Karl Rove, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, and other unknown administration officials learned that Valerie Plame was Wilson's wife and that she worked at the CIA in a covert capacity.

All of the sources interviewed separately for this story said they were told that Karl Rove was the person who first suggested using the media to "turn the tables on Wilson." The officials wouldn't identify the person who told them this. The decision, however, was made during a meeting that took place between the White House Iraq Group.

"There was a discussion about what to do about Mr. Wilson," the current State Department official said. "There was a decision to leak a story to the press - I think a few journalists - about the Wilson trip, that it was a non-issue because his wife set it up for him. They were going to show that Wilson and his wife were Democrats. Can you imagine? They were going to say 'don't listen to them, they're partisan.' It was a coordinated effort to turn him into the story. Much to my surprise, it worked."

One of the officials interviewed for this story was also cited in a September 28, 2003, Washington Post story about the motivation to leak Wilson's wife's identity to the media. "Clearly, it was meant purely and simply for revenge," the State Department official told the Post. The Post did not name the official.


I predict Libby will not be the last indictment in the Plame scandal. Not by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Hadley and the State Department????
Hadley and Rove are toast - how does Hadley forget about 3 previous written warnings not to use the Niger intel? This is a question that has been asked before and I do not expect an answer because it is rhetorical.

However I think the State Department is some where worth focusing. Leopold makes several references to sources from this department that are currently employed and retired.



Hadley/Rice + Greg Thielmann/John Bolton/State Department = WHIG = Outing of Plame

Who else would be worth focusing on in the State Department?

I have only reviewed this really quick over my lunch break, but I will check back in a few hours to see what people are saying. I have noticed that other people like levymeg and company have some information that may be worth looking into as soon as time permits.

This is very exciting, but only with the kind of excitement that is followed by the realization of what all of this has led to and allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Bolton's deputy was David Wurmser.
I'll try to link some threads on him here when I have time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Allow Me To Begin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
55. "Clearly, it was meant purely and simply for revenge." Disinformation?
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 09:28 PM by Peace Patriot
I'm suspicious of this statement. I think we're getting a selective leak here, spun away from Rumsfeld, the "Rome Group" and all they may have been up to.

You don't out the CIA's entire counter-proliferation network, 20 years in the making--something on which we all depend for our safety--and put all its covert agents/contacts at risk of getting killed, and shut down all of its projects, just for political revenge. This was a highly risky, panicky outing, in my opinion, and a coverup of something very bad (possibly Bushite effort to plant WMDs in Iraq, to be 'found' by Judith Miller). There was no need for the rush--calling at least six reporters in one week--and for exposing so many Bushites to treason charges, just to punish Wilson. The Bushites have many overt/covert ways to punish people. Rovian revenge is a cover story, in my view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope Fistzgerald takes the gloves off soon.
Actually Sept. or Oct. would be even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. YES!!!!
He's going at this from all sides, uncovering all the lies until he has them all exposed for the treasonous, poisonous bunch they are. GO FITZ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I appreciate careful, thorough case prep, but we really could use an
indictment or two right now to take the wind out of the Iran War Drumbeat Club. It would be right on target too, as the same little group of neocons and Israeli agents appear to have been behind both the Niger Yellowcake foregeries and the Larry Franklin OSP-AIPAC Iran WMD documents. See, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/15/12176/9231; also, see Larry Franklin indictment http://www.physics911.net/franklinpdf2.pdf , pp 23-24, para. 6 (FO3 is Naor Gilon, the former Mossad chief of station), see http://www.sw-asia.com/People/Bio917.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Our anxiety is based in reality.
This administration has proven its capacity to go to extremes, including the security of this nation and the commission of crimes, to execute their profiteering plan for global control.

They are using US as security for engaging in an extremely risky ideological endeavor which has PROVEN progressively futile. Unless they suffer the consequences of their crimes, they will top out as the USA and American people are sacrificed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. The danger of miscalculation in a crisis is real. So, indict, already!
I'm growing concerned that Fitz's orderly early retirement program for Bush, Dick and the Boyz may be just a little bit too orderly, under the circumstances.

Book 'em, Danno.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Beautiful, I hope Rove gives a couple of more speeches first
Before this really breaks --- I want to see side by side pictures of Rove articulating his so called campaign strategy and pictures of him in handcuffs (and/or ankle bracelet).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
53. Rove has put on a lot of weight lately...
And is becoming more shrill in his defamation of democrats. Think he's under any stress? I love these tidbits that keep him and his ilk on edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadJohnShaft Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can we trust these 'leaks'?

Given that Fitzgerald runs a tight ship - they're coming from the other side, no? what's the motive for this stuff dribbling out like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Looks like Leopold spoke to former and current State Dept staff. State
Dept people were overruled, bypassed by the neocons the Administration put in the State Dept (like Bolton, etc) and the VP's office. One imagine there's no love lost between some at State and the neocons who ignored their intel assessments, etc and ran their own show.

That said, who knows what Fitz is doing? Those who claimed they were contacted by Fitz's office appear to be speculating on the basis of the inquiries they say they had from Fitz's office. It rings true that Fitz would not be looking at the "validity" of the war itself, but rather the origin of a conspiracy at high levels to go after Wilson to discredit him. This line of inquiry would help provide the motive as well as the origins of that concerted campaign to smear Wilson.

Meanwhile, we have to wait and see....while Bush tries to sell the assertion that the executive branch don't need no stinkin' law. And the authors of the Constitution spin in their graves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. establishing motive....connecting the dots....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hahahaha. K&R
The truth's coming out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Fitzgerald would make an excellant attorney general!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Yep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Would Like It Too
But it looks like it's Patterson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. Thanks for the post. I love creeping disaster for Republicans & their ilk.





:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
47. you have to admit
There's a certain evil genius in how this administration lies to the American people.

The state department informs everybody who's anybody that the Niger claims are false, but after
the British give it validity the administration can "truthfully" report that according to the British....

It is true "according to the British"....so they can get by on a technicality.

It's too bad that they can't figure out a way to put that white hot energy they use to come up with
creative ways to lie about everything to good use for the American people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
45. I hope he finds the goods to indict Rove & Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
48. When is this grand jury due to end?
I thought I heard January, although the last one got several extensions. Get it right, Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. I believe Rove and Cheney will be exposed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
50. Great post kpete!!
Thanks a million!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. I just hope this story is accurate
This investigation is notable for its secrecy. I'm not sure about putting much stake in this account based on "sources".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
56. It's all about the forgeries, the Yellow Cake Fakes.
Bush and Rove and Cheney and Rice all know that the forgeries is what will infuriate the American Public.

Here's hoping Fitz is looking at the source of the forgeries: Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
58. The "Revenge" meme is disinfo,
in my opinion. This was hashed out ad-infinitum on the Plame threads of yore. However there is circumstantial evidence that Fitz is not so sure of that motive anymore.

In summary, Fitzgerald original filings early on in the case made mention of "revenge" as being the ostensible motive for the leak (e.g., in http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/documents/dc_brief.pdf (2004 doc) Fitz says "The Special Counsel’s investigation concerns alleged leaks of purportedly classified information by one or more government officials to reporters in apparent retaliation for a former government official’s exercise of his First Amendment right to publicly criticize the government.")

Then, as per this document (pdf), "Special Counsel outlines in great detail the developments in this case and the investigation as a whole. The ex parte affidavit establishes that the government’s focus has shifted as it has acquired additional information during the course of the investigation. Special Counsel now needs to pursue different avenues in order to complete its investigation."

After that, in the Libby indictment, and in the press conference, Fitzgerald makes no statement, hint or allusion about motive at all. None. In fact, his main theme is "we don't know why he did this! We have to find out!" Remember his baseball analogy:

If you saw a baseball game and you saw a pitcher wind up and throw a fastball and hit a batter right smack in the head, and it really, really hurt them, you'd want to know why the pitcher did that. And you'd wonder whether or not the person just reared back and decided, "I've got bad blood with this batter. He hit two home runs off me. I'm just going to hit him in the head as hard as I can."

You also might wonder whether or not the pitcher just let go of the ball or his foot slipped, and he had no idea to throw the ball anywhere near the batter's head. And there's lots of shades of gray in between.

You might learn that you wanted to hit the batter in the back and it hit him in the head because he moved. You might want to throw it under his chin, but it ended up hitting him on the head.

And what you'd want to do is have as much information as you could. You'd want to know: What happened in the dugout? Was this guy complaining about the person he threw at? Did he talk to anyone else? What was he thinking? How does he react? All those things you'd want to know.

And then you'd make a decision as to whether this person should be banned from baseball, whether they should be suspended, whether you should do nothing at all and just say, "Hey, the person threw a bad pitch. Get over it."

In this case, it's a lot more serious than baseball. And the damage wasn't to one person. It wasn't just Valerie Wilson. It was done to all of us.

And as you sit back, you want to learn: Why was this information going out? Why were people taking this information about Valerie Wilson and giving it to reporters? Why did Mr. Libby say what he did? Why did he tell Judith Miller three times? Why did he tell the press secretary on Monday? Why did he tell Mr. Cooper? And was this something where he intended to cause whatever damage was caused?

Or did they intend to do something else and where are the shades of gray?

And what we have when someone charges obstruction of justice, the umpire gets sand thrown in his eyes. He's trying to figure what happened and somebody blocked their view.

As you sit here now, if you're asking me what his motives were, I can't tell you; we haven't charged it.

(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/28/AR2005102801340.html)

..which is all a far cry from his early statements that, oh yeah, it was "political retaliation."

(Citizen Spook's analysis at http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/2005/11/treasongate-whats-mysteriously-missing.html#links is my primary source for this post)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
59. I hate to rain on this parade, but...
the fact that this has taken so long - much longer than it took to remove Nixon from office after the Watergate break-in... shows that Fitzgerald (1) doesn't have the manpower/support that the Senate Watergate Committee and the Special Prosecutor's Office had during Watergate, and (2) the Bush administration is putting up a much greater "wall" of obfuscation, perjury, and obstruction of justice than Nixon's group ever did.

Sorry, but I'm just not satisfied with a charge of perjury and obstruction of justice to Cheney's #2 man (Libby) after 2-3 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. This is not Nixon's White House
>Fitzgerald (1) doesn't have the manpower/support that the Senate Watergate Committee and the Special Prosecutor's Office had during Watergate,<

We're not dealing with the Nixon White House anymore. We're not dealing with those in the Republican Party who at least had the honor to tell Nixon he was leaving because of high crimes and misdemeanors, or he'd be impeached. We're dealing with * and his little buddies, who will do anything to hold onto power, at any cost. We're dealing with Republicans who don't have the character and courage to admit that there is something desperately wrong within the executive branch of our country.

I think Patrick Fitzgerald has one chance to get this right. I believe he's not bringing indictments forward until he has unassailable proof, and he's not operating on our timetable. If the article we read today in Truthout is accurate (and I have no reason to believe that it isn't,) this is a tsunami of unbelievable proportion.

Let him do his job. In the meantime, if you are a praying person, say a few.

Julie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. we are not dealing with a Democratic congress
Nixon's fall was accelerated by congressional investigations which, under the current circumstances, are not going to happen. Fitzgerald is going to have to do his thing without benefit of a congressional investigation. Given the way they maneuvered through the Iran-Contra mess, using Congress to nullify prosecutorial efforts, this may not be entirely a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #63
69. My point is, though
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 11:43 AM by JulieRB
>Nixon's fall was accelerated by congressional investigations which, under the current circumstances, are not going to happen.<

Yes, it was, but it was also accelerated by those in his own party who told him, under no uncertain terms, he was to resign or he'd be impeached. The only person currently in the Republican Party with that kind of courage is John McCain; unfortunately for all of us, he's too busy guzzling the Bush Kool-aid to do the right thing.

>Fitzgerald is going to have to do his thing without benefit of a congressional investigation.<

Congressional investigations nowadays are nothing more than a waste of everyone's time. He also has the benefit of being a complete Washington outsider, not having any desire to run for political office, and a passionate dedication to finding the truth.

At this moment, he's the best (and the only,) hope we have of getting to the bottom of it. I want him to do whatever he has to do to get it right the first time, because he only gets one chance at these folks. Two years and "only" five indictments? These are the first indictments of White House staff in 130 years. The last guy spent eight years and $70 million of our money to produce a stained blue dress.

I'll take those indictments and patiently wait for more.

Julie
edited to add an additional thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. I don't see any disagreement on any of these points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSchewe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
64. Believe it when I see it. This has been speculated before. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
65. When the walls...come tumbling down!!!!!
More fuel for the fire that will be the downfall of the most corrupt administration in the history of the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
66. What I never understood
Is why does it discredit Wilson in any way even if his wife did set up his trip?
She was qualified to do so and he was qualified to go. I guess they just planned on spinning it as somehow nefarious and hope that nobody noticed how little it matters one way or the other. And to top it off, she didn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. here is an interesting theory by peace patriot on this
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 04:47 PM by stop the bleeding
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=2023349


basically answers what you are asking - they outed Plame to cover up something more sinister than the Niger Forgeries


and another one here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=5505139
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
67. If this is true, THANK YOU MR. FITZGERALD. I love you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC