Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I did not know Pete Rose was elected President ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:04 PM
Original message
I did not know Pete Rose was elected President ?
He has a lot of fans. Most people are split 50/50 on whether or not he should be in the Hall of Fame. But, he broke the rules. He gambled on his own team. He knew it was wrong, but he did it anyway. Now, he thinks if he can get half the people on his side, his illegal acts will be overlooked. If he is popular, he cannot be convicted. It wouldn't be fair. That seems to be what Bush is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. But Pete Rose
was a heck of a ballplayer. Bush isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pete should never reach the hall of fame
Never. (Although I do get a kick out of his funny hair cut.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Always wondered about the gambling thing.
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 02:17 PM by NCevilDUer
Was he betting on his team to win or to lose.

Seems to me, betting to win is just putting his money where his mouth was. It only becomes problematical if he was betting to lose.

(Off topic, I know.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Short answer
Betting on your team to win, in baseball, is basically just as bad as betting on them to lose.

A manager has to think of the team's long-term health. And thus, you don't burn up your bullpen for one game just to cover a bet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Excellent point
To you and benburch. I am another who always wondered why betting on your own team to win was so bad. You both gave excellent reasons.

Pete Rose now officially sucks worse than his own haircut in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You can get better odds if you lose some games before you bet.
So, even if you bet to win, you might have been throwing games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. ditto. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Never thought of that before.
thanks for the backup, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. And what does it say if you don't bet on your team to win?
After all, word leaks out in gambling circles, and a person's bets aren't accorded the same level of anonymity as, say, meeting with the vice president's energy task force. If word gets out that Pete is betting on the Reds to win Tuesday's game, but he's not placing a bet on Wednesday's game, the savvy gambler figures that the Reds are going to lose Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. It also had to do with the people he was gambling with
if he lost a lot of money to shady bookies, they might convince him to throw a game to keep quiet or cover his losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. nice.
Mind if I use this? I know a lot of baseball fans who would appreciate the analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Please do..
I think it is an appropriate analogy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC