Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH: "If I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:25 PM
Original message
BUSH: "If I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress?"
Bush Says Surveillance Legal and Necessary By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer
6 minutes ago

MANHATTAN, Kan. - President Bush on Monday rejected critics' assertion that he broke the law by authorizing domestic eavesdropping without a warrant, saying he was doing what Congress authorized him to do to protect Americans from terrorist attacks.


With congressional hearings set to begin on this issue Feb. 6, Bush kicked his administration's new intensive public relations effort to win support for the program run by the National Security Agency. As part of that, he attempted to give it a new label — the Terrorist Surveillance Program.

Bush noted that Sen. Pat Roberts (news, bio, voting record), the Kansas Republican who is opening hearings into the program, was among the lawmakers on Capitol Hill who were given regular updates about the surveillance by the White House.

"It's amazing that people say to me, `Well, he's just breaking the law," the president said, with Roberts sitting behind him on stage at Kansas State University. "If I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress?"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Was he smirking?
Bet he was smirking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. yes, and he "he-he"'d, waited for the laughs, and damned near winked.
LOTS of inappropriate giggling & grinning throughout todays debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. MANY looks today including the smirk..... Photos!
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 03:50 PM by leftchick
Lost.....



Smirk...



penis size...



just pulled a nose hair....



needs a depends change....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. He needs a new act.
This one's getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The law says you have to 'brief' the FISA court, not Congress, you dipshit
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 02:42 PM by Richardo
That's how you're breaking the law.

We're not ALL as stupid as you and your supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. And the fourth amendment says a warrant too which he didn't have
because he didn't go to FISA. Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. The kingpins often needs fall guys
Someone to throw under the wheels to distract the coppers when the law is closing in.

That answer your question, George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nedra Pickler
Running at break neck speed to take the place of Judith Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Always was a bush butt kisser...
...and always will be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyway, it says the President is to brief the "full committee"..
Not one or two of his buds or a couple of wimpier Democrats who might be too intimidated to say anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. anyone who buys that needs to see this:
www.c-span.org

RECENT PROGRAMS >>

Democratic Hearing on Domestic Surveillance (1/20/2006)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he wanted to fight terrorism, why was he breaking the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hmmmm - let me guess. He was breaking the law and he
notified some members of Congress because . . . . HE'S A DIMWIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. What is it with Repubs and non-sequiturs?
What does briefing Congress have to do with breaking the law?

It's kind of like, "If I was driving wrecklessly, why did I have my seatbelt on?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. When did KU move to Texas?
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 02:31 PM by Oreo
Did I miss something?

The White House says none of the questions was prescreened. The site chosen for Monday's event, however, was in friendly Bush territory in the reliably "red" state of Texas.

and wouldn't it be "none of the questions were prescreened"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Actually, K State
If it were KU, I believe he'd been torn apart...

And "none" really means "no one" so "was" is appropriate here as you wouldn't say "no one were home."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Because it's Kansas
They knew they would have "friendly" question's and didn't have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. I FEEL LIKE IM TAKING CRAZY PILLS!!!!!!!!!
Is it just me?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. By not getting OK from FISA, he was breaking law. We don't know why
he chose to break the law. But he did break the law.

DOn't answer their questions. State the facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. Bingo! Without FISA, there is absolutely no oversight and protection....
From BushCo's unrestricted abuse of power and authority, nor will there be a record of how far he went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Idiot Criminal's Defense Strategy: "If I Did It, Would I Be So Stupid As
To go around bragging about it to all my friends?"

Yes, you would, because you're an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. If he was briefing them, it only means he's a dumb crook. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Covering your sorry ass. That's why.
"Look, my lapdogs went along with it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why was I briefing 3 republican members of congress?
Is what he should be saying!

Spin Spin Spin... Rovian Spinning is alive and well in the white house. When is Fitz shipping his fat lying ass off to prison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. because you were playing a game in which you were mocking congress
by pretending to keep the law while breaking it...just like a man who tells his wife how much he loves her while all the time he has a mistress on the side. same dynamics but we are on to you. darn bastard boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. From Digby on Bush's "break the law" Statement
Killing Me Softly

by digby

I'm feeling down right now. I know I shouldn't. The fact that Tom DeLay has stepped down is such a huge victory for humanity all by itself that I should be dancing a jig for the next six months. But, I'm down in the dumps, mostly because I am watching George W. Bush repeat his patented mantra for the 514,346th time. It's filled with lies, mischaracterizations and simple-minded gibberish, as always, and I'm watching it go out unfiltered, in its entirety, unchallenged by the media, no Democrats in sight, on every cable channel. I think they are personally trying to drive me crazy.

There is one new wrinkle. Regarding the illegal wiretapping, he just said, "it's amazing to me when people say I just wanted to break the law. If I wanted to break the law why would I brief congress?"

His masterful sound guy is there, compressing the sound, building the audience response to statements like that from a distant chuckle to a soft moan of appreciation, slowly ratcheting it up to a low roar until it reaches a crescendo of ecstatic, sustained hysteria. I think I even saw some rending of garments in the fourth row.

They are going to the 9/11 well again. They say that Democrats are sending talking points to Osama and giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Rove says we don't believe that the government should monitor al Qaeda's telephone calls. The next several months will be spent fending off accusations that if we don't let the president do anything he damned well pleases we are all going to die.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2006_01_22_digbysblog_archive.html#113804286022555906
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm sorry...Roberts was there!?!?

At least the hearings will be impartial. I mean, I can relax now.

Was Roberts f-ing clapping, leading a cheer, standing ovation????


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bush: "You elected me your king. How can you question what I do?"
help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. If you weren't breaking the law...
then why were those on the Intel Commitee that were TOLD about the NSA Adventures ALSO TOLD they couldn't reveal the program to anyone?

AssClown. Fucktard. Loooooooser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. It's called cover. And a few select congressmen is not 'Congress'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Please don't forget to vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. No problemo, I like your poll
just voted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Did he just admit to breaking the law?
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 03:01 PM by dave29
One could parse the President as saying he "accidentally" broke the law.

ADDENDUM: Democrats should come out in force in response to this and say "At least he finally admits he broke the law"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Didn't he do that shortly after the news broke?
He admitted what he did was illegal and because he claims "security" than it's okay when both are bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Republicans only right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. If you wanted to disregard the torture amendment, why did you sign
the law?

Same logic, actually more logical question than his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. he partially briefed one that didnt show laws broken, briefed another
that showed enough concern for rockefellar handwriting a letter saying he is concerned the president was breaking the law, but he would break the law if he said anything

this isnt a tough one. ONE reporter want to remember this. pelosi adn rockefellar needs to get back on camera and repeat what they initially said, along with the rest of congress that knew NOTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. If you weren't breaking the law,
why did you only inform 4 members & swear them to secrecy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Bush notified selected members of the Congress - end of story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saphire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
37. This seems to be Buschco's new rational......I heard it this AM on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. ...because "briefing." isn't. "asking." . . . . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
40. He got one thing exactly right...
naming it "The Terrorist Surveillance Program" describes the situation exactly.

These Terrorists have had us under surveilance for quite some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raydawg1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. Thats an easy one, So that he can deny breaking the law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC