Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Is The End Goal Of New World Order?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:48 PM
Original message
What Is The End Goal Of New World Order?
The world is being taken in a particular direction...What will be at the end?

Once NWO is place,wouldnt that be the end of all wars?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Corporatist domination, worldwide feudalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. No its not ,it means a beginning to a new end,
rid the world of those you deem unwanted and useless. Remember that was Hitlers ideal of NWO. Nothing has changed just prettied up to make it sound new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. and who are those unwanted?
and how they go about getting rid of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Look for wars by, for, and between corporate interests
It is pretty much what is going on now. If there is profit to be made or resources to be stolen, there will be wars. Thing is, nations are really irrelevant now. Trade agreements have superceeded national laws, therefore, the corporations can veto what a population votes for in their country. 'Spread deomcracy'? HA! One man, one vote my ass.

New World Order = eat the other guy before he eats you; no rules.

Welcome to the DU!:hi: Hoping to see more posts from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You seem to right in that regard..
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states
will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't
such a great idea after all." (Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy
Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I just don't see all the corporate princes giving in to one authority
any more than feudal lords did in reality. Oh, many times, dukes would profess allegiance and swear fealty, but a wise king still kept a favored child of each lord at court. They were not just there to learn manners and music.

No, human nature being what it is, there will be rivalries and fighting. And the thing that brought down communism is the same thing that will slit the throat of capitalism and watch eagerly as it lies bleeding to death: greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. "If you want a picture of the future,..."
"...imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- forever."
-O'Brien to Winston Smith in George Orwell's 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Read Red Mars for your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Old World Ordure
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 05:07 PM by dusmcj
social hierarchy to perpetuate economic hierarchy

control of access to opportunity so that the right to pursue happiness (or property, let's not waste our time with that argument) becomes a privilege controlled by a symbiotic entity of social networks and formal government - one is an expression of the other.

fascist capitalism, in which large-scale business is served by government, and in fact populates government.

a world in which the prime directive is that "Natural Law" (rather, their self-serving degeneration thereof) whose naming implies that it is received and that it is immutable, declares that survival of the fittest is the nature of life, that strength is required in order to survive, that weakness is to be feared above all else, and that to survive (or rather, thrive, as in "thrive, don't survive") we must circle the wagons, quickly converge on utilitarian organizational structures which optimize our chances of prevailing against threats real and imagined, and compromise the rights of the individual, including their right to manifest their own potential, in order to create a group which collectively operates as smoothly as possible. The key rule to making this happen is to always accept that those who already have power must be allowed to retain and increase it; this minimizes internal conflict and maximizes opportunities to maximize the aggregate power of the collective. The path for the individual to secure their own well-being is to play within this framework, and only advance to the extent that their fellows allow them to.

Abstractly it is a zero-sum view of reality in which all resources, particularly power and opportunity, are seen as constrained - if you get something, someone else loses something. The only acceptable way out of this impasse is to identify win-win solutions which increase the acolyte's advantage without leaving power-holders feeling like they have lost any of theirs.

We note that this is in direct opposition to the Enlightenment principles of the free conscious individual who exercises his volition without constraint or coercion by his fellows, guided by an internal ethical code which he forms in conjunction with abstract principles (formerly known as 'God') about what behaviors optimize or degrade physical conditions, for the individual and for society. (As opposed to what behaviors leave powerholders feeling good.)

Join the hive mind, there is no hope.

Then you'll be Firm, Confident, Connected, Under Control, have Resolve, and be a Leader. And an Owner. Since everything and everyone needs to be owned by someone (who are the people we Recognize). Abandon your silly delusions that there are any absolutes, or any standards beyond those which those with the most power, or the biggest mouths, manage to establish as truth. Accept Natural Law, everything is relative.

Thankfully, nature doesn't give a shit about the puling arrogations of the 'dominant' species on the planet and its 'dominant' culture. It's just a shame that the shitstorm that the 'dominant' ilk is unleashing will affect those normal people who represent a more evolved culture and species. I never did think we were all farm animals, after 15 years of Bush family rule it's clear that some of us are and some of us aren't. And we recall that sharp dualities like dominator and submissive lead to identity between the opposites, and hear the bleat of the little Prince on TV, and understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC