Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic-held Senate seats that could become competitive?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:03 PM
Original message
Democratic-held Senate seats that could become competitive?
We all know that NJ, MD, MN, WA, are competitive as of now. However, I'm concerned that the number could DOUBLE, considering that gas prices are feeding more Kool Aid for the Republicans.

Are there any DUers in Florida, Michigan, West Virginia, Nebraksa, or Vermont that can tell me how things are going on the ground in their states? For example, Katherine Harris is now only losing to Bill Nelson by 15% in a new Survey USA poll. It could just be a post-primary bounce, but considering how her campaign has been imploding throughout the year, I'm wondering why she's polling as much support as she is. Also, another new poll out from American Research Group shows Sanders only leading by 15% over Tarrant in Vermont. Michigan could become competitive because of Granholms unpopularity, and Stabenow is only winning by rouhgly 10%, still small enough that Bouchard could make it a competitive race.
Now, I'm not as concerned about Ben Nelson and Robert Byrd, but considering that their opponents are well-financed and the conservative bent of their states, I have decided to list Nebraska and West Virginia as potentially competitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh
WA and MN aren't really competitive; MD is an open question. NJ is the only one where we're really down, though by a small margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. MN and WA are just about in the "safe" column.
NJ and MD are the biggest challenges right now.

Follow the trends with the latest polls at the http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2006/senate/ (yes, i know it's a repuke-leaning site but good for poll updates).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Cantwell is now only leading by 6%
That story about her neutralized McGavick's loss of support:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/22/20837/7368
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't worry about that

and don't put so much stock in this gas prices linkage canard.

I can't remember a single Republican getting newly elected as Senator in Blue States since 1998. And Ken Salazar broke the opposite streak in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maryland? Not happnin, NJ .......Not in my lifetime
Menendez is up by 7%... look here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2194158&mesg_id=2194158

What you have described is a very conservative view of the senate. IMHO there are no DEM senate or HOuse seats in play. Plus the polls you cite are crap. Rassmusen has the senate 49D & 51R. The generic DEM is up 15%, 50 to 35. And Rass has a slight "R" edge even in his state polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I can't find a poll showing Menendez up by 7%
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. REPEATING.......Menendez up by 7% go here
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 10:16 PM by FogerRox
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Forget it.
Only place we are on the defensive is in NJ. The rest are safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thast right mb7588a and I have left a link that tears the NJ
Polls a new piehole, they are wrong. TO believe that Kean is up 3pts, you have to believe that Kean is takin 64% of the Indie vote.

In a Blue state. Trending nationally is to DEMS. Quiniapac said Bush was up 8% in 2004, over Kerry. Kerry won by 8%. that is a 16 pt error.

Many Polls said Forrester is tied or closing on Corzine, in the 2005 NJ Gov race. Corzine won by 9%. Thats a 10-12% error.

What NJ poll in the last 5 years actually matched election results?

There are 2 mill Indie voters in NJ.

1.3 million DEMS

850,000 Repubs.

THe probability that Kean is ahead is off the chart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd be most concerned about Stabbenow in Michigan
But honestly I doubt it will be any trouble. Sanders is one of the safest bets in the country. I think that the GOP has put up such lightweight candidates in the rest of these races that we have nothing to worry about. BTW, races always tighten up significantly as election day draws nearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. right now we have 5 senate seats in the bag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC