Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does a WH spokesman know what's in the Iraq intelligence report?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:21 PM
Original message
Why does a WH spokesman know what's in the Iraq intelligence report?
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 12:25 PM by bigtree
Why does White House spokesman Peter Watkins know what's in the National Intelligence report before our representatives in Congress have access to it?!!!

It's alright to get your PR man in on it, but less important for the co-equal branches of our government to be made aware of its full contents. We are truly in the throes of a dictatorship.


WHouse: newspaper's account of Iraq report incomplete

28 minutes ago

A newspaper report that a U.S. intelligence analysis said the Iraq war gave rise to a new generation of Islamic radicals and made the overall terrorism problem worse was "not representative of the complete document," the White House said on Sunday.

The New York Times in its Sunday editions reported that a classified National Intelligence Estimate completed in April said Islamic radicalism had mushroomed worldwide and cited the Iraq war as a reason for the spread of jihadist ideology.

It was the first formal appraisal of global terrorism by U.S. intelligence agencies since the Iraq war began in March 2003 and represents a consensus view of the 16 spy services.

"The New York Times' characterization of the NIE is not representative of the complete document," White House spokesman Peter Watkins said.

The spokesman said he would not comment on information contained in the classified document.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/security_terrorism_dc&printer=1;_ylt=Ai0kP00bIcY24Ql9Wa1rAl8b.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. for that matter....
...I think I saw Dan Bartlett accompanying Condi Rice at the U.N. He was walking right next to her, along with Bolten and a couple of other people. Why would Bartlett be so closely involved in U.N. bidness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry read it, and I suspect the repugs did, too, but didn't want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bill Frist said he did not read it because it was "classified"
that was his response on ABC This Week, he said the report had been released in April.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I wonder who has seen the report and why the American people
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 12:51 PM by bigtree
aren't privy to the conclusions . . . without the WH filter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nictuku Donating Member (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was Leaked
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 12:49 PM by Nictuku
But it also was due out in April I think, so it was being supressed before it was leaked.

http://tinyurl.com/zj4we

McCaine also said on Face the Nation this morning that he was unaware of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC