Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Alito is confirmed RoeVWade would still be 5-4 in our favor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:53 AM
Original message
If Alito is confirmed RoeVWade would still be 5-4 in our favor
Although Kennedy swings a bit because he has supported RoeVWade when cases came to the court that tried to overturn it; however, he has also supported limits on abortions when he supported CaseyVSoutheast PA Reproductive center which allowed parental notifications and wait-periods

But right now the court stands like this:

For RoeVWade: Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer, Stevens and Kennedy* (see my comments above)
Against: Thomas, Scalia, Roberts (I'm assuming we don't know yet) and Alito (if he makes in on the court)

That doesn't mean we should slack off, but just pray really hard that Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer, STevens and Kennedy all stay healthy as can be!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Although it sounds like Alito would vote to overturn it, I'm not so sure
about Roberts. Souter surprised us all by being a liberal, Roberts could surprise us all by being a moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well I'd rather assume for the worst
which means I'll fight to keep Alito and others like him off the bench. I didn't care about Roberts because he was replacing Rehnquist which was a wash. But this Borkalito is replacing a true moderate (ok except for that Bush V. Gore thingie) and that upsets me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. We'll have to see
The road to overturning Roe Vs. Wade isn't a clear straight line, at any rate.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. It occurred to me this morning while driving to work
that Kennedy now really becomes the swing vote. I hope that he realizes the importance of his position now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. But the babies that live will have no civil rights!


They aren't worried about the black babies anyway.

They only care about keeping the White population up so they can stay in power.

Diebold will take care of all of that for them.

Note: Souter may quit after they try to take his property.
I wonder if Rove is behind that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kick
:kick:

Because it needs to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. The thing is; Roe v. Wade isn't our only concern
unchecked presidential and corporate powers could make the situation in this country far worse than it already is if Alito is confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. The reasonable justices are very old and have had serious health condition
We have to hope they can last through the Bush term. This is very dangerous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. I read somewhere that Kennedy tended to follow O'Connor.
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 11:40 AM by PatsFan2004
He was persuaded by her arguments. Without O'Connor, Kennedy may follow the most persuasive and thoughtful of the justices. Roberts may be that judge since he was able to express himself in the hearings in such a manner as to persuade DEM votes for him even though his wife is anti-abortion.

None of the other justices have this gift of "persuasion".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. But how would the court break down on
the issue of constitutional checks and balances and constitutional rights? Or is that to be considered as a reason to disprove or approve of his nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. We can still win this one..Keep calling and faxing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not to be Machiavellian about this
But if the Repukes get rid of Roe v. Wade, that would be the end of their party. The moderate Republicans, who are still a large chunk of their voters, keep saying "oh, that's just a few nuts." It's not, it's the majority of their party, but if they get their way, most moderate GOP women will never vote Repuke again, and young women will be turned off the GOP for decades.

Roe v. Wade would still leave abortion safe and legal in the blue states. Let the red staters find out what life is like without abortion as an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC