Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:36 AM
Original message |
Official Alito Committee Hearing thread 3 |
Sick_of_Rethuggery
(853 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They are all doing very well |
|
This is really worth the 3 hours of our mornings!
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Thanks for moderating,VIVA |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:40 AM
Original message |
Schumer just called Alito |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. My pleasure! these threads keep me sane. |
|
If I was watching it alone, the neighbors would be calling in the guys in white coats cause I'd be be yelling at the TV and acting batshit crazy! lol
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Schumer is rocking! Called Alito's answers "perfected platitudes."
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. He's hitting Alito's record in not following precedent HARD! |
|
Even though Alito, in the hearings, tried to sound like he would honor precedent, Schumer is citing case after case where he did not!
|
mb7588a
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
5. i like the argument about not answering questions... |
|
When a fellow adult poses you a legitimate question, you should answer. George Bush and Snotty McClellan need to learn this too.
They can take lessons from guys like Feingold and Schumer and Biden.
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. In light of his unclear oral responses |
|
we must examine his written record even more closely. Alito gives impression of always charting a right wing course on too many important issues. OUTSIDE THE MAIN STREAM!!!
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
6. We can only hope that the 3rd circuit wanted him gone |
|
and hopes to keep their cases out of the SC in the future.
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Schumer: Alito's answers were "artful evasions and banalities" Terrific! |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Even more troubling is |
|
his record on 3rd Circuit--constantly criticized by his colleagues.
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. He would have opportunity |
|
on SCOTUS to overturn established precedent. Wiretapping, R v W. He refused to answer. Distanced himself from some former positions (one man, one vote), but remained opaque on these issues. Would move country backward; I have not choice but to vote "nay"!!!
|
Binka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Schumer Ripping C Thomas |
|
For ignoring precedent. Slammed Alito for his admiration of BORK. I smell a FILIBUSTER.
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Oh Gawd .. I hope so! |
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. Out of the mainstream, doesn't want to let the American people know his |
|
true views...Schumer was very hard-hitting. Excellent.
Now Cornyn is making comments that fly in the face of what Schumer just said, saying that the opposition is just repeating "rumor or speculation." Right after Schumer cited case after case to support his opposition to Alito, that just sounded absolutely stupid! LOL
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
14. 'But to suspend disbelief" |
ClayZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
31. Who's this up now? Cornyn? |
|
Once again attacking Dems instead of talking issues. Menacing language, questioning process, "Dems dumping political outbox" in hearing???? Name calling? WTF????
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
33. He is completely without morals, ethics or a basic |
|
understanding of the American Experiment..
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Is that all our dems now? |
|
Have they all spoken today?
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. yep. nothing but pugs left. |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
29. did I miss Durbin? Did he speak yet? |
|
I have to go do some work today (If I want to be able to listen tomorrow) but I don't want to miss a dem!
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
41. Durbin now! Won't miss him! n/t |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
44. oops! I was wrong! here he is. |
Greeby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
18. John "Judge Killer" Cornyn now |
|
Turn your volume down if you value your brain cells :crazy:
|
mb7588a
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
19. We have a powerhouse lineup of Dems on this committee. |
|
It's absolutely stacked. I love it. These Repubs. are not at the level of their fellow Dems. I guess I shouldn't be surprised by that.
Go Dems! :kick:
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
28. These Repubs are not at the level of their fellow Dems |
|
not even close. it is good of us to appreciate and acknowledge that fact
|
Darkhawk32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
21. LOL. He's whoring out Alito's wife again. n/t |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Here come the tears! Cornyn just couldn't resist! n/t |
Proud_Lefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
24. Cornyn is a total prick |
|
When a matter goes beyond a jury, the attorneys are concerned with credibility of the witnesses. When it goes before a judge, a lot more emphasis is put on the facts. Who are we going to believe? The Republicans that have stolen and cheated us out of everything or the Democrats who appear to always be looking out for the American people? Now he's pulling out that we made the wife cry. Good God.
|
Shortyfuse
(114 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
67. Dubya Dubya Dubya. I goose Step for Bush.com |
|
All Republicans go to this site of Dubya dubya dubya. I hate the middle class.com
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Boo hoo hoo, it's so sad his wife cried. Forget about the coat hangers. |
|
Those women who will cry forever, if this clown gets put on the court.
These pukes make me want to scream.
|
Shortyfuse
(114 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
THE REAL STORY THERE WAS THE OTHER WOMAN BEHIND ALITO. SHE WAS A MEMBER OF BUSHS' JUSTICE DEPT.(EXTORTION CENTRAL) AND A MEMBER OF THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY, AS IS ORRIN HATCH AND OTHERS
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
26. Oh jeez..."enough to make you cry." (Cornyn) For this we should confirm a |
|
SC justice? Because those bad Dems made his wife cry? Is this supposed to be a sympathy vote????
:puke:
|
jbnow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
47. That crying wife picture |
|
coming up was enough to make me turn it off.
Did any senators start to cry?
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
59. Un-freaking-believable!! |
|
Has nothing to do with this nomination--milking shamelessly.
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
27. he is SHOWING A PHOTO OF MRS ALITO CRYING |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 11:52 AM by FLDem5
okay, I am updating:
Dem: His record clearly shows his words do not match his deeds
Rep: I think he seems like a stand up guy.
Dem: He works to erode privacy rights
Rep: This one judge I spoke to likes him fine.
Dem: His decisions show a complete disregard for workers/woman's rights
Rep: This one black judge likes him.
Dem: His record reflects a pre-disposition to allow for unchecked presidential power.
Rep: You guys are mean to him and his poor wife. Give the President his way.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
39. I can't believe he did this.. |
|
"This is what the American people understand"
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
42. I thought that was Judd Nelson |
|
Sorry that is probably my last chance with that joke
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
45. I get it now. Repubs are saying they should give Alito a "sympathy vote" |
|
to become a Supreme Court Justice of the United States because the Dems made his wife cry. Makes perfect sense, huh? (As an example of coo-coo Republican thinking, that is.)
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
30. Damn straight! Principle over Politics...! |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 11:54 AM by Viva_La_Revolution
Does this mean Cornyn will be voting nay? :sarcasm:
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
35. LOL, John Cornyn wouldn't know a principle if it bit him in the ass |
|
and the principle would instantly wither and die from the contact.
|
Proud_Lefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
40. I can't believe the comment about people thinking for themselves |
|
Unlike what the liberal agenda is all about. What a fool!
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
unwarranted attacks, blah, blah blah!
|
Darkhawk32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message |
32. Now he's pulling out the "we won the election" angle. n/t |
ClayZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
37. Ahhh, but they did'nt WIN the election... and he knows it. |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
38. "can't prevail at the ballot box" |
|
Can't wait to see this smug bastard go down!
I would love him to be a pinata!
|
MadisonProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
34. God is Cornyn an asshat! What a fucking LIAR! |
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
97. feel sorry for me, he is one of my Senators yuk |
Shortyfuse
(114 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
36. Had to mute Cornyn from Texas |
|
I know his background in Texas. He was instramental in putting almost al the black in one town in jail for cocaine use. Hell most of them could not afford it. They were released from prision when it was proved that they were not guilty.
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
48. Durbin brings up Miers as Republican's pinata.... |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:07 PM by realFedUp
one man's pinata is another man's Supreme Court Injustice.
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
Bringing up nomination of Harriet Meyers. Raises important questions--not just another nom. to SCOTUS, but obviously replacement for S D O'Connor.
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
54. OMG. I forgot about that. |
|
It's all too much to remember.
And a big WELCOME to you! Glad to have you on board.
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
61. I remember that too - disgusting actions there |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
62. What??! I have never heard about that? |
|
Why does he hold an elected office.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
84. tulia? what did he have to do with it n/t |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
46. OOoooh Durbin comes out swinging! We are supposed |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:01 PM by FLDem5
to be meeting about Harriet Myers! Slammed them good.
|
ClayZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
53. Yeah, talk about PINATAS... Harriet Meyers was a pinata for the right. |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
49. Durbin pointing out what they did to Meirs! |
|
"gave her the back of their hand!"
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
50. Ha! We were suppose to be discussing the Harriet Miers nomination, |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 11:58 AM by in_cog_ni_to
NOT Alito. You tell 'em Dick! :loveya:
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
51. That was THE defining moment in this circus. |
|
I am dyin' I tell ya'!
:smoke:
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
57. a thing of beauty. . . n/t |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
69. NOW, Who got their clock cleaned??? |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
55. 1985 memo for Justice Job |
|
Was he a callow youth?.. No .. that memo were not the musings of a child but 10 years worth of his judicial belief. They evidenced a closed mind..
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
56. "not the musings of a child" |
|
so it wasn't a "youthful indiscretion" when he added that stuff to his application. Go Durbin, Go!
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
|
with sincerity--when asked if precedent must be followed, Alito refused to answer.
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
60. "after we saw Harriet Myers, the Presidents counsel REMOVED |
|
because she didn't meet the litmus test"
THIS SHOULD BE THE MAIN ARGUMENT.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
71. Exactly. They told us what their agenda is when they attacked her. |
|
and YESTERDAY at their sicko rally....they must get ScAlto confirmed to undo Roe.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
63. Roe is settled law and ScAlito refused to acknowledge that. |
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
65. Scalito has a lot in common with * |
|
refusing to acknowledge the law of the land.
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
75. He is not the right person |
|
for the SCOTUS at this time. Durbin
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
66. What was that about left-handed Presidents? |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
70. that is how Alito justified his decision |
|
That left handed persons could not demand a jury of left handed people.
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
73. Alito said that the fact that a black man was convicted by an all white |
|
jury was as irrelivant as the fact that (whatever #) of presidents were lefthanded.
:wow:
|
Darkhawk32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
|
A black defendant wanted an appeal because he had an all-white jury for 4 trials.
Scalito refused because he said that 4 consecutive white juries = 5 out of the last 6 Presidents being left-handed. He equated it to that.
|
adigal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
68. As an aside, I just called Lindsay Graham |
|
and gave his office my address and asked him if he wanted to COME TO CLEAN THE CLOCK of my husband, a NYC firefighter who was disabled by 9/11, and myself, because we dissented against the nomination of Judge Alito.
I should not get myself this angry over these assholes. I truly think Lindsay Graham is LOSING his goddamn mind. He did NOT used to be this crazy. Maybe they are threathening to out him from his closet, and he is playing along.
|
Darkhawk32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
78. Who was he threatening? n/t |
Shortyfuse
(114 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
|
I tried several and the line where all busy.
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
72. The Dems clearly got their ducks in a row for this meeting. Now, if they |
|
will only also do so regarding a filibuster...
Durbin is also speaking eloquently against Alito. The Dems, if this were to be decided purely on the arguments in the debate, would clearly have it won. Too bad that's not the criteria.
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
76. Alito's "encyclopedic" knowledge of law...but can't remember CAP |
ClayZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
79. Or writing the checks for the dues to CAP for 14 years. |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
82. I love how they cherry-pick rhetoric. |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
|
They keep harping on fact that Roberts was passed with no prob. Then why not Alito?
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
92. I can't watch this hokum anymore.....adios |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
77. "he didn't have a note in front of him" How impressive. |
|
Boy, that's not lowering the bar - he didn't need notes for a hearing he was PREPARING FOR for a month.
You are way too used to Bush as a world leader, Brownback.
|
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #77 |
91. The fact that he is intelligent is not the issue. How he would *decide* is |
|
There are lots of highly intelligent people with goofy ideas.
|
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
80. Is it my imagination? Are Republicans being tepid and subdued? |
|
Except for Lott, of course. Mr. Grand Grandstander!
|
ClayZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
94. They seem to be whining more than usual! |
kiteinthewind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
81. Sen. Brownbuttlick, great! |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
|
:rofl: I've never heard that one! I like it! :thumbsup:
|
kiteinthewind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:10 PM
Original message |
Unfortunately, I live in KC area |
|
on the Missouri side, but Kansas and MO are both backward, for the most part! :eyes:
|
Shortyfuse
(114 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #86 |
90. thats BrownBush Boot lick |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
|
Both Roberts and Alito in favor -- well, duh!!! As if they'd say anything else!
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
93. "Classes of people being aborted |
|
just for who they are" WTF???? "Religious freedom--displaying the 10 Commandments--yes in one state, no in another! Boo Hoo!
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
88. Does he ever talk about anything BUT abortion! |
|
He is WAYYYY to fixated on it.
|
Darkhawk32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
89. It's all they have. n/t |
kiteinthewind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
96. Gov. Sebelius had to put up with |
|
him Bush and another Repug I can't remember, in the limo to KS State yesterday for Bushie's speech. :(
|
Shortyfuse
(114 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #89 |
|
I think Bush is counting on a religious backlash. Why because they can orginize. Funny how the religious right does not take up the fact that we are replacing our industrial revnues with gambling revenues and all the gangsters that come with it. Bush vs Rico in 2006
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
95. Very bizarre fixation... |
|
what skeletons are hanging in his closet?
|
kiteinthewind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #95 |
100. Would LOVE to find some!!!! n/t |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #95 |
|
of Dems on committee. Sen. Coburn-OK
"What is maintream? Real reason he could be rejected is that he might rule in favor of the weakest" (fetuses, of course)
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
103. Forget Roe v Wade, let's repeal women's voting rights. |
|
In a bygone era, blacks weren't citizens. Ah, the good old days.
There are some very ugly Senators representing some very ugly citizens in this country. Ugh. Puke.
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
99. Did ya see Durbin's face!!??? |
|
I know what he's thinking.... "What a freaking looney toon!" :rofl:
|
jhain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
All those Dems have expressed all those concerns about Scalito, too. It WAS the xtain wingnuts who killed Miers.
Freak.
|
kiteinthewind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #101 |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
102. Leahy just entered into the record |
|
letters against Alito, and Editorials written since the hearings.
:)
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
106. "the most vulnerable little guy in the world, the unborn child" |
Wordie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
107. Time for a new thread, I think. And thanks, Viva, for your efforts on this |
bettyellen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
109. straight party line vote- call C-Span NOW here's the numbers |
|
202 585 3885 Democrats 202 585 3887 Independent
|
LeftCoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |