Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China Secretly Fires Lasers To Disable U.S. Satellites

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:10 AM
Original message
China Secretly Fires Lasers To Disable U.S. Satellites
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7005024630

Report: China Secretly Fires Lasers To Disable U.S. Satellites

September 29, 2006 5:33 p.m. EST

Julie Farby - All Headline News Staff Writer

Beijing, China (AHN) - China has secretly fired powerful laser weapons designed to disable American spy satellites by "blinding" their sensitive surveillance devices.

The previously unreported attacks have been kept secret by the Bush administration for fear that it would damage attempts to co-opt China in diplomatic offensives against North Korea and Iran.

The military affairs publication Defense News reports that there had been a fierce internal battle within Washington over whether to make the attacks public. In the end, the Pentagon's annual assessment of the growing Chinese military build-up barely mentioned the threat.

"After a contentious debate, the White House directed the Pentagon to limit its concern to one line," Defense News said.

--snip--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Bush wants it kept secret, let's expose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Please test it on the Fox News satellite
Just so we can be sure that it really works.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read an article in the local paper last week I think it was
I'll have to kick and recommend this as it is very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Chinamen gett'n jiggy with the satelites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. One year and a couple of months ago our own NSC issued a
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 08:31 AM by higher class
document that included the finding that Iran wouldn't have nuclear bombs for ten years. No decent human being involved in nuclear weapon studies thinks Iran can be ready with nuclear weapons for years - one said three years at the most if everything fell into place perfectly.

Well, ships are headed to the Gulf of Hormuz, soldiers are being told they are gong to Iran, over a year ago we were told their were some kind of undercover troops in Iran. This PNAC admin only needs some ridiculous excuse and we're in there - for the benefit of PNAC at the expense of innocent people.

What does it mean?

Where is our superiority?

We now torture, we now deny rights, we now 'disappear' people - some in Lear jets.

SO NOW we have a country with the technology to take out our satellites and the country is OUR CREDITOR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But China won't fit on the Axis, too many people, they'll break the axle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. cool!
Good for them if they don't want to be overflown by nosy watchers. A few laser blindings
could reduce the US space fleet in no time, surely they have the power turned down, but
if it was cranked, who would eat the roasted satellite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Testing...testing
set lasers on stun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. No. Not cool. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. big kids with big laser pointers
its hardly like new technology anymore, and really, given who's in charge, can you blame them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. This isn't a secret.
If we pass satellites directly over their country, why wouldn't they fire at them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Open Skies Treaty
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 09:02 AM by formercia
http://www.state.gov/t/ac/rls/fs/2004/33147.htm


is the framework but China hasn't signed on yet.
Origin and Purpose

The Treaty on Open Skies entered into force on January 1, 2002, and currently has 30 States Parties. The Treaty establishes a regime of unarmed aerial observation flights over the entire territory of its participants. The Treaty is designed to enhance mutual understanding and confidence by giving all participants, regardless of size, a direct role in gathering information about military forces and activities of concern to them. Open Skies is one of the most wide-ranging international efforts to date to promote openness and transparency of military forces and activities. The original concept of mutual aerial observation was proposed by President Eisenhower in 1955; the Treaty itself was an initiative of President George H.W. Bush in 1989. The Treaty was negotiated by the then-members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, and was signed in Helsinki, Finland, on March 24, 1992. The United States ratified it in 1993. This Treaty is not related to civil-aviation open skies agreements.

Membership

The 30 States Parties to the Open Skies Treaty are: Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and United States. Kyrgyzstan has signed but not yet ratified. The Treaty depositaries are Canada and Hungary.

The Treaty is of unlimited duration and open to accession by other States. States of the former Soviet Union that have not already become States Parties to the Treaty may accede to it at any time. Applications from other interested States are subject to a consensus decision by the Open Skies Consultative Commission (OSCC), the Vienna-based organization charged with facilitating implementation of the Treaty, to which all States Parties belong. Four states have acceded to the Treaty since entry into force: Finland, Sweden, Latvia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The OSCC has also approved applications for accession by Lithuania, Estonia, Slovenia, and Croatia. Croatia ratified the Treaty but has not yet deposited its instrument of ratification. Cyprus�s application for accession is pending before the OSCC.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. So long story short
China is under no legal obligation to not fire upon the satelites?

This is going to get ugly when China makes a grab at Kazakhstan oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. I always wonder why articles like this come out just before the elections.
Could it be FEAR! That is all they have left and money for lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. according to the article
the Administration wasn't keen on publicizing this. They are interested in attacking Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Now who could ever have anticipated this????
Certainly the Bush* Cabal could not have. They have never anticipated anything in their lives...:shrug: I mean come on.... Big surprise here....:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. All our satellites have been blinded but...look over there.. A Terrorist!!
:grr:

When will the grownups get back in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC