Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Jury Orders Reprimand, No Jail for Soldier"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:19 PM
Original message
"Jury Orders Reprimand, No Jail for Soldier"
FORT CARSON, Colo. (AP) - A military jury has recommended that an officer once facing up to life in prison for the interrogation death of an Iraqi general be given only a reprimand, a decision that drew applause from soldiers.

Initially charged with murder, Chief Warrant Officer Lewis Welshofer Jr. now faces no jail time, the forfeiture of $6,000 in salary and what amounts largely to a barracks restriction for 60 days.

"I deeply apologize if my actions tarnished the soldiers serving in Iraq," Welshofer said during his sentencing hearing. "It was never my intent to cast aspersions on their tremendous accomplishments."

Welshofer was convicted Saturday of negligent homicide and negligent dereliction of duty for stuffing the Iraqi general headfirst into a sleeping bag and sitting on his chest.

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20060124/D8FB1BTG9.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if it had been an American general...
...who had died while being "interrogated" by an Iraqi, would the decision to let him off also have been "applauded?"

Impossible to respect any so-called "soldier" who actually applauded this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have to agree with that
If this is what military service means, torturing, killing, and then letting the perpetrator go free to the applause of his brother officers, then there's damn little that's honorable, noble or good about it. And by the thundering silence from the rest of the military, I presume they acquiesce in this verdict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's fucked up. I know I just stated the obvious
but damn.....that's fucked up.

They are making this worse by allowing the guilty to walk free. These chickens will come home to roost.... soldiers will be tortured and murdered....and it would be pure hypocrisy for the US to be outraged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Military justice is to justice what military music is to music"
- Groucho Marx

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Next time I hear about "Law and Order" and the sanctity of human life
You can bet I'm pulling this one out. Suffocate a man to death in the midst of a beating? Sixty days barracks restriction. Caught in possession of 30 hits of LSD? Life without parole, maximum security. It's the fucking world turned upside down. And these douchebags are cheering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Because it's one less war crime on the record of the military
If it had come to a conviction, it would be recorded, and it would stain the military's prestige and record permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Upside down and inside out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shouldn't have this been an international issue instead of internal?
You have a military system set up to process individuals in the military who may or may not be guilty. Pardon me for asking, but isn't there an inherent bias and/or conflict of interest programmed into such a system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another sign that the apocalypse is alread upon us.
The rest is just watching where the debris falls and trying to stay out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Funny how the arbitrary amount of $6,000.00........
was assessed for the life of an Iraqi general (to be taken out of his pay). $6,000.00 was the original amount of life insurance paid to the beneficiaries of dead American soldiers until they raised it to $12,000.00. Don Imus raised such a stink that congress raised it to $250,000.00. Just struck me as an odd amount.
I can't believe I now live in a country where wholesale torture is sanctioned and outsourced, a slap on the wrist for murder as long as you're in the military and the death penalty is carried out on the mentally challenged in our prisons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Welcome to Rome. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC