Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNC: Why Did Tom Reynolds Cover Up Congressman's Sex Crimes?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:18 PM
Original message
DNC: Why Did Tom Reynolds Cover Up Congressman's Sex Crimes?
9/30/2006 2:01:00 PM
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=73539

Contact: Damien LaVera of the DNC Press Office, 202-863-8148

WASHINGTON, Sept. 30 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The Democratic National Committee today released the following, "Why Did Tom Reynolds Cover Up Congressman's Sex Crimes?":

Yesterday, Florida Republican Congressman Mark Foley resigned from Congress when sexually inappropriate emails and instant messages he sent to a teenage boy came to light. While the shocking exchanges produced an immediate uproar that cost Congressman Foley his job, at least one member of the House Republican leadership had known about the situation for months and did nothing about it: New York Republican Congressman and chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee Tom Reynolds.

According to the Associated Press, Congressman Reynolds' spokesman confirmed that Reynolds had been informed by another Congressman that the boy had complained about Foley's inappropriate communications "months ago." According to the report, the allegations first came to light in late 2005 (AP, 9/30/06). It appears that Reynolds did not tell authorities about the emails or take any step to discipline Foley, apparently choosing instead to sweep the matter under the rug to protect the Republican party's dwindling chances of retaining control of the House of Representatives this November.

"Congressman Reynolds' inaction in the face of such a serious situation is very troubling, and raises important questions about whether there was an attempt to cover up criminal activity involving a minor to keep it from coming to light before Election Day," said Democratic National Committee Communications Director Karen Finney.

"We need real answers to important questions about precisely who knew about these activities and when they knew it, whether other current or former pages were victimized by Congressman Foley, why the Republican House leadership was prepared to adjourn without at the very least referring this matter to the ethics committee, and what corrective action if any Congressman Reynolds and the rest of the Republican House leadership took. Failing to answer to these questions would send a terrible message to the parents who entrust their children to the care of the Page School and send them to Washington to serve Congress."

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=73539
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many scandals does this make for the repugs?
Honestly, it's bordering on the ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's in the voter's hands now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep too bad the MSM will not connect all the DOTS as usual!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2855921

It is the repugPEDOPHILElican way
The theory is they use this to blackmail important people like legislators and other prominet leaders to go thier way in voting controling the military etc etc.


Got Fascism Yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Could New York's "Fighting 26th" be in PLAY??? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They did call Reynold out by name
makes sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC