Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repubs ask, what is the difference?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:49 PM
Original message
Repubs ask, what is the difference?
We voted for Ginsburg knowing she was a liberal. So now, Alito is no more a conservative than Ginsburg was a liberal. So why do the Democrats vote against him? What's the difference, they ask?

Well, here's the difference. If Ruth Ginsburg had been the "swing vote" on the Supreme Court, you assholes would have filibustered her. Alito is the "swing vote" on the Supreme Court, so stop the nonsense and silly comparisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. The biggest difference: Clinton *consulted* with Hatch first...
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 02:11 PM by Richardo
Presented him with a list of candidates and asked which ones the GOP could support. Hatch indicated Ginsburg was one of them.

If Chimpy did that once in a while, he might see more bipartisanship, if he really cares to. My view is he doesn't give a shit WHAT the DEms think or do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Exactly, he goes out of his way to be a little bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ginsburg admitted her position on Roe vs Wade
Alito would not offer a position on anything. He was like a robot sitting there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ginsberg isn't a liberal.
Ginsberg is a moderate, as is Stephens, and Breyer. NOBODY on the Supreme Court is liberal, much less "as liberal" as Alito is conservative. There is nothing conservative about advocating autocracies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. advocating autocracies is "conservative"q
when you don't want to change the "status quo" - usually, dictatorships don't want to change the "status quo" - they don't want to lose their safety net.

The Conservatives in this country didn't want to lose their chance at a lordship in England in 1776 . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does Justice Ginsburg (then nominee) consider as "gospel" the theory of a
unitary executive? No, and I don't notice that she's into pissin' on the Constitution either but I could've missed something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:21 PM
Original message
The big difference here is the fate of the United States! With Alito
supporting the radical right's theory of 'unitarian executive', we will be turning the USA into a military dictatorship!
Nothing of that importance was present when Ginsburg was seated on the Court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Duplicate....sorry.
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 02:22 PM by sinkingfeeling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because Conservative is simply an ideology that gives
more wealth and power to the wealthy powerful few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC