Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does CNN have NO standards anymore-this Glenn Beck guy....?.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:52 PM
Original message
Does CNN have NO standards anymore-this Glenn Beck guy....?.
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 11:58 PM by nam78_two
Apart from the racism, sexism, war-mongering, general asshat syndrome...This person is just SO stunningly ignorant!

Its actually kinda funny...This guy is talking about what Nature reported about-the suppression of research on the ties between global warming and Hurricanes...

And this guy starts talking about it and its BLATANT that he has NO idea what Nature is...And he is talking about science confidently and its clear that he thinks that because the journal's name is "Nature", it must be some "new-age hippie" journal that doesn't really have anything to do with science...

:rofl: :rofl:

I mean I know that:a) If you are not in science you don't necessarily need to know the stature of Nature, b) Right wingers don't care about facts...
But still, he is on CNN for chrissakes...couldn't someone have told him that its one of the most prestigious layman-friendly journals in science...

I would eat my own offspring to get a paper in there :P (not really big brother-that was a joke-I don't actually eat babies)....


Edit: I am writing to Mediamatters about it even if no one watches him. You shopuldn't be able to tar one of the most selective scientific journals on a channel many people get their news from. Nature is very outspoken about the suppression of climate change science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one listens to him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I saw that his ratings have been going up
no link though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. He's waaay below Countdown............waaay down!
:evilgrin: Something like a 186% down. Keith had stats on his show the other night! Beck was at the bottom of the list! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Awesome/nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Between him and Nancy Grace CNN has jumped the shark
can't stand even looking at either of them..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thankfully I have never come across this Nancy Grace/nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. AWFUL harpy...
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 12:20 AM by progdonkey
She's a former prosecutor whose whole schtick is that her fiance was murdered and the killer was let off free by a corrupt system that supposedly cares more for the rights of the killers than of the victims (you know the routine). Nevermind that this whole story turned to be largely fabricated by her (she was dating a guy that was murdered, but the "travesty of justice" angle was basically BS).

She hates defense attorneys and believes herself to be THE crusader for victims' rights.


She even recently berated a woman whose infant was missing.

The woman later committed suicide before the interview was scheduled to air, and even after being informed of the suicide she still ran the interview.

She's truly vile; at least Glenn Beck has never berated anyone to suicide (how's that for a compliment? ;-) ).

Edited to add: here's a clip on YouTube from a panel on Scarborough Country discussing the whole suicide story, and Joe shows clips from the "interview," so you can get a feel for what this woman's like. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Xuej2IfPE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. wha.....
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 12:22 AM by nam78_two
where do they find these people :shrug:


>>>She even recently berated a woman whose infant was missing.

>>>The woman later committed suicide before the interview was scheduled to air, and even after being informed of the suicide she still ran the interview.

>>>She's truly vile; at least Glenn Beck has never berated anyone to suicide

:wow:

I am gaining a new appreciation for Beck ;)! Oh the tragedy...that these are the opinion makers...man...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. It seems they have very low standards
Glenn Beck had an extremely vulgar radio show, not that long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, they don't. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. He thinks it's a nudist magazine
full of hippies.

I like Glenn Beck. Whenever I am having a rotten day, I remind myself that no matter how bad things are, at least I know that I am NOT Glenn Beck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't torture yourself ...
My dear husband changes the channel when that a**hole Glenn Beck appears on our Television. He knows that I will yell explicatives at the television and is afraid that I'll put my fist through the screen, he knows his wife of 24 years. :blush: I kid you not, he's a Right Wing NUT. In fact, Glenn Beck is so arrogant and self-possessed, I'd bet my paycheck that he even periodically pisses off his Momma. :wow:

No, I've not ever seen a nastier O'Reilly wannabe than, one each, Glenn Beck.

O'Reilly is a horse's patootie, but Glenn Beck adds SMUG to the mix. :nuke:

I can't stand to even look into his beady little eyes.

What a f**king TOOL! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. This Nature thing was actually kinda funny overall though
:rofl:
He is giving this opinion authoritatively and he clearly goes by the name and probably thinks as another poster pointed out-its a nudist magazine or something.

I would (obviously) never seek it out..but sometimes its good to know what the other side hears, so I am not thrown of balance when they use some completely bs argument and I cannot retort....
Good to know what to refute :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. You make sense!
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 12:53 AM by ShortnFiery
Yes, it's good to know what the other side is thinking.

It must be some emotional underpinnings of my past belonging to an "academic Sorority" that gives me the angry response.

Whenever I hear Glenn Beck spew RW propaganda, I think of all the a**hole fraternity boys that I had to tolerate in my college life. Many of which were white, arrogant, ignorant bastards who were in love with their own voice.

Yeppers! Your term - "The Other Side" is spot on. :-) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Its like a trainwreck
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 01:07 AM by nam78_two
;)

I get what you are saying though...John Stossel and his porno moustache have the same effect on me....His whole "I am so sensible and unbiased" stuff really ticks me off :grr:. I can't watch him...

Beck is so over the top, he is atleast kinda funny ;).

:hi: btw...I am also short and fiery ;) and it sounds like my boy-friend would be able to relate to your husband :P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Excellent News! Thanks!
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 01:12 AM by ShortnFiery
BTW Glenn Beck would be the kind of guy that I'd line up against in a flag football contest.
Our sorority used to host a flag football marathon in the fall. I'd get bruised but very satisfied when I'd line up across one of the fraternity jerk-offs, only to flatten them when the play started. :evilgrin:

There are benefits to being truly SnF. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Flatten???!!!!
You be violent ;)-those lefty enemy combatants...

I am going to bed and I will leave with you this :P :

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Beck is a "me too" propagandist, but this *is* interesting in one way-
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 12:22 AM by Marr
you mentioned how he just instinctually goes into the traditional right-wing propaganda mode of "smear the source, ignore the message". They all do that. I think they do it without even trying. It's the only way they can keep their world view intact, especially these days, with all the obvious evidence that their ideas are unrealistic and foolhardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. yeah
Maybe they are afraid of what they would find if they actually did some research..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. he just says what everyone's thinkin'..ha..chuckle...
What a dipshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. yes if we were all bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. Glenn Beck is way more knowledgeable than some hippy claptrap like Nature.
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 12:38 AM by Beelzebud
After all. Those hippy freaks have only been publishing since the 40's, what the hell do they know about anything? :D

:D

Glenn Beck is the same moron that talked about how he'd like to strangle Michael Moore to death one day on his radio show. CNN has totally jumped the shark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. hee hee
I think he might actually have referred to it as hippie clap trap...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. ROFL
Those people are so cliche it doesn't suprise me. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. I take great pleasure in changing the channel on him
Even ignoring his rightwingness.....he is just so ANNOYING as a person. So self-satisfied and snarky. CNN is in the midst of a brain cramp, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
20. In fact, most of the articles in Nature are peer reviewed
It is indeed one of the top interdisciplinary journals in science (and Glenn Beck is indeed an asshat).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. No no no
you are behind the times...Its title is "Nature"-its clearly some "new-age" stuff :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. Answer: No, Actually. CNN has no standards. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
29. CNN has become a pestilential
sewer and Fox-wanabee. They just haven't quite reached the extremes of Fox yet, but they are catching up pretty fast, expanding their outreach to the freepers & braindead with trash like Beck. I'm amazed Jack Cafferty still has his job. Outside of Keith Olbermann and the satirists (Stewart/Colbert) there isn't much left that isn't info-entertainment or Foxified on the entire for-profit side of televized news. Just take a gander at any local news show from one of the old major networks (ABC/CBS/NBC). Identical, interchangeable, stupid and scary as hell. National is just as depressing. CBS putting featherweight Miss Smiley Perky Pants Katie Couric in the anchor seat was very telling and extremely depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC