Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State of Denial: Two months before 9/11, Rice gave the 'brush-off'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 02:33 AM
Original message
State of Denial: Two months before 9/11, Rice gave the 'brush-off'
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/State_of_Denial_Two_months_before_0930.html

State of Denial: Two months before 9/11, Rice gave the 'brush-off' to 'impending terrorist attack' warning


Update: Former Counsel to the 9/11 Commission suggests that "ery possibly, someone committed a crime" by engaging in a "cover-up" of the warning)

According to a new book written by Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, two months before the September 11 attacks, then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice gave the "brush-off" to an "impending terrorist attack" warning by former C.I.A. director George J. Tenet and his counterterrorism coordinator.

An article in Friday's New York Times first mentioned the warning, and a front page book review of Woodward's State of Denial in Saturday's edition provides more details.

"On July 10, 2001, the book says, Mr. Tenet and his counterterrorism chief, J. Cofer Black, met with Ms. Rice at the White House to impress upon her the seriousness of the intelligence the agency was collecting about an impending attack," David E. Sanger reported on Friday. "But both men came away from the meeting feeling that Ms. Rice had not taken the warnings seriously."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have two questions. When did Woodward know about this and why is
he bringing this info to light now??

Seems to me that this info was important five years ago, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Who would have listened to it 5 years ago?
Vital or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, probably me too.
But we'd have been so far in the minority, and not anyone with any real power to do anything or even insist that it be looked into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC