The Republicans are soft on freedom

[LeftHander]

How about that for turning spin back around on them...?

[eallen]

1. They're not "soft" on it -- they have targeted it for destruction.

[postulater]

2. And Bush just took away the freedoms

that the terrorists hate us for.

[Solly Mack]

3. allergic to it

freedom scares them

[indepat]

4. Soft on humane treatment, soft on the rule of law and justice, soft on

protecting the economy, the job market, the value of the dollar, fiscal responsibility, our standard of living, the environment, our ports, our nuclear facilities, our chemical plants, our infrastructure, our health care, we the people, our Bill of Rights except the 2nd Amendment, our Constitution, openness in government, checks and balances, separation of powers, separation of church and state, the separate but equal main branches of government, an apolitical civil service system habeas corpus, the land of the free and home of the brave, a two-party political system, our founding doctrines, et al. Am I but one of a few who realize they must hate of country, our Republic, our Constitution and have something totally different in mind, to wit: a radical corporatist theological totalitarian police-type state where one man is the sole decider? The really sad part of this is we the people will almost certainly return to office almost all the aiders and abettors of this radicalism come November and, if so, we truly will deserve the government we get. Long live the King.

Edited: grammar