rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:04 AM
Original message |
"the House would have moved to expell him" had ABC not broke the |
|
story. newt saying this Chris Wallace now
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Jane Harman saying Dems should have been informed of situation. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. she says it is going to the Ethics committee only because Dems made |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Newt making it sound like Repugs were aggressively investigating!! |
patricia92243
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. gee, Newt did not say WHY!---he is making claims and expects people |
|
to believe him---and repugs will
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Is Newt saying he's known about this for a year, too?? |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Sounds like it to me. |
peekaloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message |
6. That Tadpole is full of horseshit. |
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It's CYA time.
They had a year to do something about it...and they didn't. Just keep hammering that point.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. yup--but he is spinning it for the Fox crowd. |
AIJ Alom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Blatant lie. The House leadership couldn't even remember if they had |
|
spoken amongst themselves about Foley. Boehner changed his story and Hastert can't even remember. So who exactly was doing the investigating if the finger pointing was going on ???? Why were the Democrats not informed ? Why was Foley allowed to run for re-election unopposed in the Republican primary ? Why did National Republicans not recruit a strong candidate against him ???
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. of course it is a lie----but Newt makes claims -like the WH does_ as if |
liberaliraqvet26
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
but they left him in so it wouldn't hurt politically, that is just as damaging. thats no excuse.
|
slater71
(586 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Yeah, after the election. |
|
Then they could appoint another repub in his place.
|
AIJ Alom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. meaning that they knew about this and did nothing for political gain. |
fasttense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Then why didn't they run someone else in the upcoming election? |
|
If they were going to expel him, why hadn't they tagged someone else to run on the repuke ticket in Florida? And to wait a year while Foley tip toes through the Pages? They are going to need to spin this better, or it is not going to go away.
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Does Faux providing cover for the Gang Of Pedophiles |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 08:48 AM by No Surrender
who did nothing for almost a year really surprise anyone? It's business as usual over at Faux. Faux continues to make me sick...:puke:
edited for typo
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Sure, well after the elections and out of sight of tv cameras. |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 09:04 AM by spanone
But the truth is newt g. They didn't expel him. They didn't ask him to leave. AND THEY KNEW. THEY FUCKING KNEW. YOU SICK FUCK.
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Question: If newt gets the nod for the next GOP run, will we |
|
have to define marriage as the union between a man and three women?
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message |
22. This is a new angle on the spin--blame ABC (via Newt-and Wallace did |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |