The FBI & GOP Leadership Is Giving Foley Time To Scrub His Harddrives

[KittyWampus]

every minute the FBI delays in seizing Foley's computers... gives him the chance to scrub them of evidence.

There is already material evidence and first hand testimony pointing to Foley's guilt.

Does he have illegal child porn? More damning IM's?

Didn't a Democratic House member have his office raided and computers grabbed?

[AIJ Alom]

1. Wow. You are absolutely right. n/t

[madokie]

2. the operative word is Democratic

:puke:s are the grownups :sarcasm:

[populistdriven]

3. Yes but only because King George authorized it

[formercia]

4. Foley is being protected

by some very powerful people. They don't want him to sing.

[Subdivisions]

5. He can scrub all he wants to. He'll still have to surrender it

and the data is not completely deleted and can still be found on the hard drive by computer technicians.

[mediaman007]

9. Gee Whiz, I bet they just swap out hard drives...

Foley: "New hard drive on my computer? News to me...Could be...I dunno..."

He'll walk away

[WyLoochka]

6. Can they not get his

downloads and ims directly from aol? I was under the impression that catching pervs was one of the stated reasons, in addition to terrorists, that the DOJ wants isps to save search, email, im and download records. What was aol's stand on this? I thought they handed over the search records without any resistance.

[KittyWampus]

8. Hey, good point... about how GOP uses Child Porn as an excuse to make

searching private records/data easier for law enforcement\

[mom cat]

26. Poetic Justice!

[Joanne98]

14. That's just an excuse they use. They just want to spy on US!

[bunny planet]

16. yes, exactly, catching child predators was the main reason

Abu Torquemada G. said he needs to read everybody's emails on the internets.
Let's start with Foley's, shall we torture boy.

[MissWaverly]

17. What about Super Gonzo our AG

and his battle against Child Porn, which is why he wants to know whats inside everybody's
computer, well, here's a clearly documented case, let's see our Attorney General, action
figure, in action. What are they going to do? Once again, the facts are staring them
in the face.

[Toots]

7. I read someplace the FBI has been investigating this for several months

Pedophiles can't or won't quit so I am sure there is very recent evidence to be had plus so far over five Previous Pages have come forward and will provide testimony.

[maddezmom]

10. K&R

xposted this in LBN to this post:

Agencies consider whether Foley should face charges
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2538833&mesg_id=2538833

[Rockstone]

11. Hastert fought against FBI raids for congress

What's he hiding?

[Bjorn Against]

12. Excellent point

I did not even think of that, recomended. Just one more and you will be on the Greatest Page.

[catmandu57]

13. What about the recipients?

there has to be stuff out there that the perv mailed, I'm sure the kids don't have access to the drive wiping that this perv had.

[Joanne98]

15. Excellent point. It should be on multiple hardrives!

[nebenaube]

18. On multiple clients and on servers too!

Yep, I imagine the nsa already has a copy of everything he said...

[malaise]

19. CNN said a while ago that his office

has been sealed off. We'll see if anything was scrubbed.

[RandiFan1290]

21. That would be a good start

They also need to get the laptop that he was using on the road.

[Justice Is Comin]

20. Hmmph ABC said they already had TWO come forward already

and there may be as many as 5 !!

It's like Christmas.

[Imagevision]

22. One would think that the Dems would have this crucial info secured?!!

Dems sometimes can be disappointing, but someone thought ahead to gurantee Foley's $100,000 pension, fucking pathetic!

[KittyWampus]

23. there's no way of knowing how far Foley went without investigating

and checking his hard drives, phone records, credit card bills etc.

[dickthegrouch]

24. Just like Al Capone, we might have to

Get Foley on some related charge, such as Spoliation of evidence. It is very clear that the IMs exist. It is very clear that the e-mails exist. If it can be proven that a law maker, who should know better, deliberately destroyed evidence, he will be guilty of an offense.

Anytime criminal wrongdoing is covered up, especially on computers, there's a possibility of that charge coming in to the mix.

[Pachamama]

25. Yeah, but they can't scrub every single Page's computers!

:eyes: