CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:37 PM
Original message |
Look at ABC's news home page!! |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 05:38 PM by CatWoman
|
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I am not giving ABC news any legitimacy at all until they can prove that they are truly neutral. ABC netwok certainly isn't and by extension, neither is their news department.
|
stella
(212 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. ABC WANTS US BACK AFTER THE PATH TO 9/11 |
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. then they should do a PATH TO PEDOPHILIA!!! |
grateful581
(760 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
"The Path to Pedophilia, the Mark Foley story" get to work ABC :rofl:
|
Hawkeye-X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
25. with an EXCLUSIVE interview |
|
Mark Foley tells all! No-holds barred and explicit!
Prominent Republicans about to be EXPOSED! Scandals right and right (not gonna say left and right)!
Immediate resignations are to be expected after the live interviews from multiple Republicans!
|
nicknameless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
The day AFTER they air Fahrenheit 9-11.
:)
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
31. Yep. How about starting with this? |
samsingh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
34. that's a very good idea. |
tex-wyo-dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
37. Better yet, they should do "Path to Dictatorial Fascism"...n/t |
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
38. Too bad for abc, I'm not back |
|
And I'm not missing a thing.
|
Tom Yossarian Joad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Wow! I guess they had to wait and see what Rush and Sean had |
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
There's a post in GD Politics, where it is revealed that Foley asked one guy to "measure his dick".
Damn!!
I thought "I" was the only one who made such requests!! :rofl:
|
Hawkeye-X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
26. You can ask me anytime, sweetie |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Dunno what you're bitching about - it's the best front page.... |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 05:44 PM by BlooInBloo
... I seen in a long time...
Auto-cycle of main-frame pics:
1) FBI opens Foley investigation 2) GOP coverup of Foley sexual predating 3) 9/11 hijackers laughing
That's as excellent a 3000 word summary of the nation being run by the GOP as I could come up with.
But you can keep bitching about it if you like - I think it's on target.
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. where did you get the idea that I was "bitching"? |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 05:44 PM by CatWoman
my comment about what took them so fucking long was/is directed at the DOJ.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. "what took them so fucking long" |
|
Didn't recognize ya there tho - lol - I really should look at the author before replying - rofl! my bad!
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. The Author Should Have Little To Do With Your Response. |
|
No matter who the author was you simply responded inappropriately and assumptively. Who the author was doesn't change the context of their message, which is what we are to reply to, nor does it change the context of yours.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
pampango
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
36. If I worked for ABC news.. |
|
I would point out that I pissed off the left and now I'm pissing off the right. I have no idea if they are seriously interested in professional journalism, but, if anyone there is, they are probably happy the left and right each think ABC is a tool of the opposite end of the political spectrum.
|
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Won't go there, thanks for the summary. n/t |
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. I'll post the text for you: |
|
The FBI has opened a "preliminary investigation" of disgraced former Congressman Mark Foley over the sexually explicit Internet messages he sent to congressional pages, all male high school students under the age of 18.
Agents in the FBI's Cyber Division have already begun to examine the texts of some of the messages, according to a FBI spokesperson.
Officials say the FBI and Department of Justice lawyers are trying to determine how many such e-mails were sent, how many different computers were used and whether any of the teenage victims will cooperate in the investigation.
It's possible Foley could be prosecuted under laws he helped to enact, as the co-chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children.
Two sets of sexually explicit instant messages obtained by ABC News were sent to pages beginning in 2002.
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
Wheezy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"This all came to a head in the last 24 hours." Says the second link.
Yipes.
|
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
You have got to be kidding me! :eyes:
Looks like they're either not taking it seriously, or having a little fun at Foley's expense.
|
chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
13. without a screen cap, it's hard to tell what to cheer about |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 05:52 PM by chat_noir
You mean this?
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
:hi:
gonna teach me how to do that?
please? :)
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Push "Print Screen".
Then open photoshop. Open a new file. Once you have it named, hit Ctrl-V, or paste. Then flatten layer. Save file.
Ta Da!
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
30. thank you very much, G |
liberaliraqvet26
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
17. they have won me back. |
|
actually I never boycotted. I don't have a nielson box so i really dont think it matters what i watch. Besides I like to study the other side.
|
AnotherMother4Peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
20. ABC & Disney are on my "Don't patronize stupidity" list. Can't go there. |
tinfoilinfor2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
27. So now ABC's beggin' for me to come back. |
|
I figured not watching GMA and Desperate Housewives would put them in a slump, but who knew I hurt them THAT bad? Well, screw it. I'M not for sale. :P
|
readmoreoften
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Of course they're going to run this piece of sensationalism. |
|
I don't think that means they give a shit about the truth.
|
OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message |
32. someone better put this guy on suicide watch . . . |
|
his name and photo are going to be in every publication in the country, if not the world, along with transcripts of his messages . . . there's no happy ending possible, and he knows it . . .
|
samsingh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message |
33. abc starting to report real news again. |
KnaveRupe
(700 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 06:16 AM
Response to Original message |
35. ABC News Division showing that P2911 was not their f*ckup - |
|
but rather the ENTERTAINMENT division?
Ideally (and historically) the two were completely separate. Lately, News has BECOME entertainment. Could be that the suits in News are trying to assert their independence.
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
39. Wonkette is really starting to slip |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |