MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:04 PM
Original message |
So, are they going to filibuster, or not? |
|
What's the latest scoop? Inquiring, and rapidly going insane from the suspense, minds want to know!!
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Don't. Hold. Your. Breath.
|
CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Voltaire99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
21. Your zen cup runneth over, sensei. |
|
The glacier is no match for your Flying Patience Attack!
|
Voltaire99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Afraid you're right.
One should expect nothing from invertebrates other than the occasional spirited wiggle. ;-)
|
mom cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
20. Instead of holding your breath, use it to make phone calls. |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. No one's committed either way...yet. nt |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We'll letcha know, so don't you worry your pretty little head.
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Patience - I'm still hoping ..... n/t |
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:07 PM
Original message |
I'm hoping for the political play of the century |
|
don't know if we'l get it.... but I'm cheering for our team !
|
CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Who knows? It's a poker game and Reid ain't giving any clues. n/t |
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Harry would be a good Texas Hold em player. |
CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. He is, after all, from Nevada! n/t |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. Yup! A foe of organized crime Mormon from Nevada! He rocks! n/t |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
36. I was referring to Texas hold-em |
|
mormons aren't supposed to gamble. Which is funny, as Nevada has a large mormon population.
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd be inclined to say YES!!! |
|
It's all out on the table now.
Peace.
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Woo Hoo, I like your answer! |
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
7. it is looking that way. |
|
if not now .... when? if not somebody who lied under oath ..... who? if he can not remember about his past actions ........ where will he remember the SCOTUS?
I called every dem Senator last week and asked them to filibuster Alito.
|
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Hoping but not optimistic. |
|
It would be a rare instance of courage in the face of fire. Doing the right thing even if it came with a political price.
|
The Stranger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Remember what happened to the Patriot Act just last month. |
|
All of the Democrats sat around on their hands until Russ Feingold said he would filibuster no matter what. The groundswell built until even Republicans were voting against cloture.
Of course, there was also the time the Democrats needed one Senator to sponsor Gore's recount, portrayed famously in Fahrenheit 911. And not a single solitary Democratic senator would come forward.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They are keeping them guessing at this point. Even when the filibuster is under way, they will not admit that they are filibustering. :)
|
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Man, talk about ambiguous responses! |
|
I've been busy all day and haven't had time to watch C-SPAN. Was hoping for something more clear cut. Oh, well.....:sigh:
|
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. WHEN they filibuster, the repukes are in for the ride of their lives. |
|
Skanky rat bastards!:grr:
|
Joe for Clark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I thought yesterday Kerry said he was going to filibuster - |
|
Did I miss something?? Joe
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
32. He supports a filibuster. Judiciary Committee Dems and Minority leader are |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 04:13 PM by blm
the proper leaders of a filibuster on court nominees.
For Kerry to do it, he would be stepping outside protocol, and that would really piss off Judiciary Committee members.
When Kerry signalled he would support a filibuster, that should have emboldened committee senators that they would not stand alone.
|
firefox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
18. CNN 1:57PM translates to "Forget it" |
|
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/24/alito/index.html has this paragraph- Democrats have all but dismissed any attempt to filibuster the nomination. But several on the panel used the vote to attack the president's policies.We should remember that this is CNN though. This report was really to say Alito passed the committee and is now going before the full Senate for a vote.
|
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
22. The DNC will never get another dime from me........ |
|
if they don't. Oh, and third party here I come. If I'm going to waste my vote on Democrats that do nothing I may as well waste it on a third party and at lease have someone who has the balls to stand up to these thugs, guaranteed loser or not.
I'm close to abandoning the Democratic party since they seem to have abandoned me.
If they fail to filibuster, it will be the final straw. "Independent Underground" here I come! ;)
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. give me a break, so if 5 senators out of 45 Dems don't want to filibuster |
|
you are going to leave the party...
what a joke...
and I am not even a democrat...
why don't you work on getting 10 more Dems in there like the 40 that will filibuster...
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. It only takes one senator to filibuster |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 04:00 PM by TechBear_Seattle
And only 40 more to keep the filibuster going. If the Dems can't summon even that against a fascist with a proven paper trail opposing the rule of law up for THE CHIEF LAWKEEPER OF THE LAND, why in the world should I give the Democratic Party the time of day?
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. It takes 41 to vote no on cloture |
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
31. One to filibuster and 40 more to support the filibuster |
|
That adds up to 41, last I looked. :toast:
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
They ask for cloture and vote. I think you even have to have a certain number of senators to get the cloture vote to start with. One person doesn't do filibusters anymore, unless they're going outside the general rules of the Senate.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
25. I'm 55 years old, voted democratic all my life, but when we have |
|
to call and beg our senators to vote down a fascist corporatist to the Supreme Court we have a problem! I'm afraid that they'll ignore us for corporate $$$ and they can kiss my ass goodbye!
|
Roy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
29. The general tone coming from comments after the vote tally... |
|
I think hints strongly toward fillibuster.
fingers (and toes) crossed.
|
Hyernel
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
30. They are going to Filibuster, and here's why.... |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 04:08 PM by Hyernel
The rumor is now that the Dems won't do it, which is smart, because if a Filibuster is to be effective, we can't give the Wingnut media time beforehand to "frame" the filibuster the way they want to. Never give the Rethugs a fair warning, or a chance to spin it.
The best way to do a Filibuster is to tell no one that you're going to do it...make people think you're not going to do it....then, the moment the Senate gets to the voting, FILIBUSTER!!!! Then go all in, and never let up. Surprise them.
Wait and see....that's what I would do.
;)
|
nanbrown
(35 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-24-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
33. i doubt they will filibuster |
|
i have called all the gang of 14 and every other dem and jeffords. in no one's office did a staffer seem upbeat. not one. in my many years of activism, the affect of their voices is telling. i will keep on trying using my bread money for phone bills.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message |