Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC says most of the Foley e-mails are too sexually explicit to broadcast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:05 AM
Original message
ABC says most of the Foley e-mails are too sexually explicit to broadcast
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 09:06 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2514770&page=1

Foley's Behavior No Secret on Capitol Hill

October 1, 2006— It turns out Foley's obsession with 16- and 17-year-old male pages has been known to Republicans on Capitol Hill for at least five years.

Two of them were sent to pages in the 2001-2002 class, with sexually explicit messages, most too graphic to be broadcast, from Foley using the screen name Maf54.

A reference to his request that the page provide the measurements of his sexual organ, a request he repeatedly made to another page as well. snip

Former pages tell ABC News the pages involved with Foley were afraid to offend the powerful Republican congressman.

"So there would definitely be some hesitation especially for the people who want to move up in politics eventually," Loraditch explained. "You know, you don't want to get involved in something like that."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anybody know if Foley was ever a page?
From the "old stories" of activities in government and at the White House, perhaps he was a victim as a young man. How long have they had pages in Congress? JAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I remember 'gay pages' being all the rage in the late 70's early
80's. Must have been a big scandal back then, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. C'mon ABC; if we could stand the semen stains on the blue dress...
C'mon ABC; if we could stand to hear (endlessly) about
the semen stains on the blue dress, we can stand to
hear what the Republican said.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Bloode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Kinda bad news for Denny.
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 09:27 AM by William Bloode
It more or less shoots down the whole "overly friendly" meme.

Edit to add----->

I also saw several posters claim that one of the pages called the first e-mails "sick" in a CNN quote this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, he had to try, didn't he? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. So why didn't Foley check himself into
a clinic in these five years?:rofl: :rofl: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. But the emails were to a 15-year-old. At least, the ones we saw were. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC