NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:20 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Who would you rather have explain to you if Foley is a pedophile or not? |
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Agreed. An excellent point. Maybe the pedophile party can tell us. |
|
Why they're really not. I'd like to hear.
|
bananas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
3. He had a foot fetish? nt |
SmokingJacket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm going to have a bumpersticker made that says "Tell Me Again Why Foley is Not A Pedophile."
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Listening to their splaining should be more interesting. |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I want to hear Tony Snow say he is a "predator" not a "pedophile" |
|
That would be very interesting.
Don
|
princehal
(341 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Explain? Why should DUers want to explain? |
|
When knee-jerk condemnation is so much more fun? But hey, if we can win by using what we normally call "Republican dirty tricks" by appealing to people's fear, hatred and bigotry, then many of us are all for it. Don't forget to mention - Foley isn't just a pedophile - he's a GAY pedophile. Probably a satan worshipper, a witch and a terrorist too.
|
acmejack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |
9. The arresting officer... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message |