Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Is A ChickenHawk....WHY!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:47 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld Is A ChickenHawk....WHY!!!!


Anyone who would go to South America and say...."I will not Resign" is a CHICKENHAWK....Does he not have the guts to make that statement here is his own country??????....remember the DIXIE CHICK fiasco????...same game in my opinion...

Why does RUMMY hate the USA so much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. chicken-hawk????

By my limited understanding of the term, Donnie doesn't fully qualify for full "chicken-hawk" status.

He served in some capacity in the Korean War of the early 50's, so, like all that have served their country in the military, he deserves some recognition for that.

That makes him some what less hypocritical than Dick Cheney, who "had other priorities" besides serving his country when it asked him.

(For that matter, I did too. They abolished the draft when I turned 18, so I was not required to serve. At the time, I don't recall being patriotic enough to do so. Thank God. I am so not a military kind of guy. I am horrified at the prospect of killing or being killed, no matter what's at stake!)

-85% jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Rumsfeld Was A Naval Officer BEFORE The Korean War
Got out before the North crossed the 38th Parallel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Rummy entered the service after the Korean cease-fire
He served in the United States Navy from 1954 to 1957 as a Naval aviator and flight instructor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You're Right
Got my dates mixed up with someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why Our Military Despises Donald Rumsfeld...
Why Our Military Despises Donald Rumsfeld
by Ralph Nader

Published on Saturday, December 31, 2005 by CommonDreams.org
by Ralph Nader
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1231-05.htm
Civilian control over the military is a long established democratic tradition in our country. It was the military that was believed by our founding fathers to be susceptible to plunging our country into foreign adventure. Presently, however, the boondoggles, crimes and recklessness of draft-dodging George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and former Air Force pilot, Donald Rumsfeld, together with their draft-dodging neo-con associates, have turned this expectation upside down. The civilians are the war-mongers.

Probably the least told story of the Iraq war-quagmire is the extent to which the Pentagon military, especially the U.S. Army brass, disagrees with and despises these civilian superiors. Donald Rumsfeld, one of the most disliked of the Secretaries of Defense, has spent much energy making sure that high level dissent in the military is muzzled and overlayered by his loyalists.

Just last week Rumsfeld demoted three military service chiefs in the Pentagon hierarchy and replaced them with three loyalists who previously worked for his buddy Dick Cheney.

Right from the beginning the U.S. Army brass opposed the invasion of Iraq for both military and strategic reasons. They believed such an attack would absorb massive human and material resources that would divert from the chase after the 9/11 terrorists and the resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. They disagreed with the paucity of soldiers that Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld were to send there. They were appalled by the lack of post-war planning directives by the Administration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC