Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In office discussions about Foley today, ugly truths are "outed."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:08 PM
Original message
In office discussions about Foley today, ugly truths are "outed."
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 02:09 PM by marmar
Like many on this board, I'm thrilled by the potential damage that the Foley scandal could cause the Repugs. But in discussions at work today about the topic, another consequence emerged, and this one is not so good.
A coworker of mine, who very much considers himself a liberal, was discussing Foley's exploits, and ended with "...and he was sending them to the wrong sex - that's just nasty!" Sadly, a couple of other coworkers nodded in agreement. I called him on it, figuring that hearing it from another heterosexual guy would have a bigger impact on him, and said it would have been nasty no matter what the sex of the minor he was talking to. He retorted, "Yeah, but that's just extra gross."
Unfortunately, I suspect a lot of people are thinking the exact same thing. I think there's going to be this inevitable tie in many people's minds between "gay" and "pervert." And as an African American male, I can definitely relate to that whole phenomenon of having "the worst of your group" held up as the representative for the whole group.
Sorry for my whining, but it's been bugging me all day, and needed a little DU group therapy. :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Half the people have an IQ that is below average,
Your co-worker is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yup...


the half that voted for Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skiddlybop Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Tell them this...
Foley was IN A 19-year RELATIONSHIP ... but he obviously ended it because he did not want to be bashed and demoted in the Rethuglican Party like David Dreier was early this year.

So Foley should have been happily partnered...but no, in the Republican Party you have to deflect all of that and seek secret sex with the powerless so that you don't have to explain having a full and equal partner. Or you get what Dreier got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here ya go!
:hug:

The problem is that Foley is a pervert/predator. His sexual orientation means nothing. I know you know that, but I am just sending some reenforcement. You can't make the blind see; just try not to wind up hating them - that's the really hard part...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Thanks...
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think what he meant was...
Being propositioned for straight sex when you're straight is icky, but gay sex when you're straight is even moreso. And he's right, if that is what he meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think you are right that the few tend to represent the whole in
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 02:18 PM by Texas Explorer
the eyes of society.

Your post is right on the mark. Thanks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another way to look at it.
Which actually doesn't make your coworkers look any better: in their minds, it's more "normal" to harass young girls, it's kind of all right, wink, wink. After all, they're only girls. Ergo, Foley would just be being a regular guy if the teens he'd been preying on had been young girls.

Ick on your coworkers. They revealed their misogyny along with their homophobia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. throwing my body in the group hug...... big sigh
ya.......

thanks for sharing your experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yup...my concerns exactly.
I knew as soon as this scandal broke that people right of center (maybe even some dems as well) would be associating Foley's pedophilia/chickenhawk behavior with gays, much as they did when the former Spokane, WA mayor, James West, was "outed" for his pedophilia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for your post nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. You bet. I felt it needed to be said.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Are you implying its bigoted to find homosexual sex distasteful?
Really, what do you want, should everyone be required to get hard when watching homosexual porn?

Isn't that kinda what makes one either homosexual or heterosexual, one's taste in sex?

People are not bigoted, nor troglodytes, nor even in the lower 50% of intelligence simply because they might find the sexual practices themselves of people of another orientation distasteful.

I don't like Nuoc Mam, does that mean I hate all Vietnamese? I gag at the disgusting, horrendous stench of poi, am I anti-Hawaian?

I have met women who find heterosexual fellatio disgusting, are they anti-heterosexual?

Jeeze. Okay, in order to be politically correct, I will have to say "although I find anal sex between men and boys to be a beautiful way to express spiritual and physical love, I am appalled that Congressman Foley attempted to do this with young House pages."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't think the issue is whether or not you find gay sex "tasteful"
But the linking of homosexuality with perversion....or the linking of black with crime, or Latino with illegal alien, or Arab with terrorist. It's having people always frame you through the negative actions of one person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Preciseley
Personally, I find anything of this nature involving kids to be repugnant, distasteful, and one of the worst offenses that a person can commit, regardless of sexual preference. I think most people feel this way (or at least I certainly hope they do!)

I think what makes this stick out to most people is that the Republicans have made the "Gay" issue one of their trump cards over the past few election cycles. But to have this thrown in the faces of the voting populace is sure to resonate with some, no matter how much damage control is done. First impression is everything and this certainly doesnt bode well for Republicans, no matter what they try to do to smooth it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. There was a quote from a co-worker.
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 03:33 PM by patcox2
She said "thats just extra-gross," and I took that to mean he was picturing an act of homosexual sex. And I interpreted the objection of the first poster as an objection to anyone finding homosexual sex acts themselves intrinsicaly disgusting.

I just don't think thats a sign of bigotry. I have dated girls, for example, who found fellatio "disgusting." Many homosexuals do not like anal sex at all. I find it disgusting to think of Anna Nicole Smich having sex with an incontinent 90 year old.

Of course I agree 100% that homosexuality should not be confused with or equated with pedophilia or other aberrant behavior.

I just wouldn't have taken offense at that remark "thats extra gross."

Its a matter of taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Got it; judging homosexuals by what some do is bad, but judging catholics
by what some catholics do, thats good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimeChaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. There's a difference...
between finding homosexual sex distasteful and declaring it wrong and perverted.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. I used to be concerned about this during the Catholic priest pedophile....
scandal. Around that time a local Catholic priest had been convicted of molesting two little girls. It only demonstrated that pedophilia occurs with either sex, and it should not be tolerated either way.

If there is a larger Republican pedophilia scandal lurking below the surface, and I'm sure there is, then it should definitely be uncovered and I doubt that their targets were only young boys. I believe this was also demonstrated in the Franklin scandal. If we give in to fear-mongering then we might as well let the B*sh mafia do whatever the hell it wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC