11 Bravo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 03:36 PM
Original message |
One big difference between Gerry Studds and Mark Foley. |
|
The Democratic-controlled House Ethics committee exposed the Studds affair, and the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives censured him (even though the young man involved had engaged in consensual acts and was over the age of consent). Lets compare and contrast, shall we? Mark Foley's victim (and that is the proper word - the kid found Foley's advances "Sick, sick, sick") was 15 years old, and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives did shit. The Speaker of the House was aware of Foley's behavior for over a year, and tried to sweep it under the rug. The Republican-controlled Ethics committee did nothing, in fact, the sole Democratic member of the committee wasn't even informed of the charges. If the Repugs want to try and draw a corollary between the two events, well, in the immortal words of our chickenhawk-in-chief, "Bring it on."
|
Crazy Dave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Has the White House, the Limbaughs and the Hannitys... |
|
...blamed Bill Clinton for Foley's actions yet?
|
11 Bravo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Limbaugh claimed today that the "Clinton War Room" |
|
is responsible for holding onto the information and releasing it close to the mid-term elections. Of course, he is a drug-addled fat fuck, so we need to realize that it's the drug talking.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. What difference does it make when it was released? |
|
Rush is saying that the damage control is all that's important, that the GOP now doesn't have time to "fix" the problem, apparently. I guess that's sooo much more important than the welfare of the kids who were harassed by Foley.
Jeebers. Rush is an idiot.
|
freefall
(617 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I had forgotten the details and it is good to have them in order to respond to those who claim the two incidents are the same.
:D
freefall
|
hughee99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I though Foley met the kid when he was a congressional page? |
|
And congressional pages need to be at least 16 years old.
|
ieoeja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Studds: 30 years ago Democrats learned and disclosed legal, but unethical, sexual activities with a page by a fellow Democrat.
Foley: today Republicans tried to hide illegal sexual activities with a page by a fellow Republican.
Once again proving that there is no difference between the two parties. :sarcasm:
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Hey - don't confuse right wingers with THE FACTS |
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-02-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Sugar, that's more than one difference. |
|
Thank you for the insight! :hi:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |