Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP editorial: ANYTHING GOES in Bush Admin. - - for the ideologically pure.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 06:48 PM
Original message
WP editorial: ANYTHING GOES in Bush Admin. - - for the ideologically pure.
'Anything Goes' Administration
In olden days, the president -- or Congress -- would put a stop to this.
Monday, October 2, 2006; Page A18

...."Simply stated, short of a crime, anything goes at the highest levels of the Department of the Interior," Inspector General Earl E. Devaney told a House Government Reform subcommittee last month. "Ethics failures on the part of senior department officials -- taking the form of appearances of impropriety, favoritism and bias -- have been routinely dismissed with a promise 'not to do it again.' "

At the Education Department, its inspector general found, officials violated conflict-of-interest rules and steered contracts for its $4.8 billion Reading First program to favored textbook publishers....

***

Meanwhile, three top officials at the Department of Housing and Urban Development told the inspector general there that Secretary Alphonso Jackson had said "it was important to consider presidential supporters when candidates for HUD discretionary contracts were being considered.''...

***

And then there was the U.S. Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, which sent -- in the account of The Post's Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "the loyal and the willing instead of the best and the brightest" to help rebuild Iraq -- with a screening process that featured questions on whether applicants voted for George W. Bush or even what they thought about Roe v. Wade....

***

These dots connect to form a disturbing picture -- not so much of greed-fueled corruption as of ideologically driven coziness. Those who differ from the party line are excluded from the benefits of power, while those who toe it are welcomed and, if they err, quickly forgiven. A more responsible president would put a quick stop to this. A more responsible Congress would insist.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/01/AR2006100100810.html?nav=most_emailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Damn damn damn
Can you imagine the amount of doo doo the republicans would have built up about just one of those actions. They would have been clamoring so loud the roof of both houses of congress would have been blown off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Any one of them would have been major stories -- even on cable news. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Aint that a Fact! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R...Culture of Crime....Everyone get on the BUS...wait! only "certain"
people will be "allowed" to sit at the front of the bus....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. anything "short of a crime" ???
That's a laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Series!" :-) nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. to get an appointment in the Bush administration, you must prove . . .
that you have no, or at least minimal, knowledge of or experience in the field in which you will be working . . .

the one exception is regulatory appointments, which require that you be entrenched in the industry that you will be regulating . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC