Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proof Hastert lied and more conserv. calling for his resignation...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:56 PM
Original message
Proof Hastert lied and more conserv. calling for his resignation...
Mr. Hastert, who returned to the Capitol to deal with the escalating scandal, was pressed by reporters to explain why the first communication between Mr. Foley and a page, which was brought to the attention of Republican leaders last year, had not led to more assertive efforts to determine if it was an isolated case.

Mr. Hastert defended the Republicans’ handling of a parent’s complaint last year about communication from Mr. Foley to the parent’s teenage son. But he acknowledged that the e-mail inquiring about the boy’s well being and requesting a photograph was potentially troubling.

“I think that raised a red flag, raised a red flag with the kid, raised a red flag with the parents,” said Mr. Hastert, who repeated that he could not recall learning of the messages before news of them broke last week.

snip:
The Foley matter was also drawing criticism from some conservative groups. Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a legal advocacy group, said any member of Congress who knew of Mr. Foley’s communications with pages and did not take meaningful action should resign. “And let’s be clear,” Mr. Fitton said, “the overly friendly communications that the House leadership has admitted to knowing about are not innocent and should not be downplayed.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/03/us/03foley.html?hp&ex=1159848000&en=e7617045b3e5a934&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. "potentially troubling" but didn't "raise a red flag"? BS jargon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm starting to think that Hastert and a few others...
won't have much of a political career by the time all is said and done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. we can certainly hope not.
hope they don't get hired by non-profits working with kids either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC