What role did Gov. Tom Kean play in the cover-up of the "meeting"?

[kentuck]

Did the good Governor vote to keep it a secret and keep it out of the 9/11 Commission Report? Why did the Democrats, like Ben-Veniste and Hamilton, go along with it? Or were they just out-voted? Shouldn't they have still leaked the story?

With the son of the good Governor running for Senator of New Jersey and riding his father's coattails in many ways, shouldn't we take a closer look at Governor Tom Kean? After all, he was paid for his role in advising ABC on their fraudulent docu-drama, The Path to 9/11. How much influence did he have in the making of that piece of propaganda? Maybe ABC should be more honest about that?

(edited to correct to Senator)

[indepat]

1. My brother asked if he could call back: had been chatting with Gov. Kean

in a NYC antique shop about an area of mutual collecting interest. I was impressed then, but not so sure any more.

[LiberalEsto]

2. Excellent point. Menendez should raise this issue.

Just one small correction, Kean's son is running for US Senate, not governor of NJ.

[kentuck]

5. Thanks . corrected...

I knew that. Must have been thinking of something else? :)

[shain from kane]

3. The Path to 9/11 included false meetings, but not this important meeting,

only about 2 months before 9/11. Or was the path all ready established, so it was irrelevant? Stonewall continues. There is something further that they are trying not to reveal.

[myrna minx]

4. Kean's seal of approval on the Path to 9-11 fiction and his convenient

omission about the Rice/Tenant meeting shows intent to mislead to me. :grr: He has lost all credibility.