Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Questions about the Big Lies Told to the 9/11 Commission.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:36 AM
Original message
Big Questions about the Big Lies Told to the 9/11 Commission.
Edited on Tue Oct-03-06 09:56 AM by leveymg
Finally it comes out. The CIA did give secret, detailed warnings to the White House about imminent terrorist attacks in the weeks before 9/11. Everybody involved, along with those told about it afterwards -- the Bush Administration, the Agency, the 9/11 Commission -- kept that fact hidden from the public for five years. Why?

Of course, Dr. Rice still says she can't recall being briefed. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/2/114456/850 But, it's Condi's word against George Tenet, Cofer Black, Richard Ben-Veniste and records kept by the White House and the 9/11 Commission. The New York Times isn't buying Condi's story, and now says that not only was she briefed about the threat on July 20, 2001, she then recommended the Agency also brief Donald Rumsfeld and Attorney General John Ashcroft. Ashcroft got briefed, Rummie ain't talking. Game, set, match. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/03/washington/03rivals.html?hp&ex=1159934400&en=a8d116e7a90c4c5f&ei=5094&partner=homepage

After a slew of contradictory statements, denials, and some clumsy efforts to weasel out of the issue, one thing is apparent:

The 9/11 Commission Report is filled with lies, omissions and distortions. It's time for a Special Prosecutor.

Problem is, there's a long line of lies and resulting issues to be resolved:

All the public testimony given the 9/11 Commission and the earlier Joint Congressional Intelligence Committee hearings was under oath. There was a lot of perjury. This raises some difficult legal and procedural issues:

* Where public testimony by officials omitted, obscured or distorted many things, did contradictory private testimony given to key figures behind closed doors "cure" appararent misrepresentations made for the public record?

* If witnesses were allowed to publicly lie in this way, what was the point of swearing them in before Congress and the Commission?

* Who decides whether any lies to Congress and the Commission should be prosecuted? Alberto Gonzalez? Philip Zelikow? Lee Hamilton? Speaker Hastert? Chairman Spectre? State prosecutors in the various locales where testimony was taken?

CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS

The legal issues attached to this thing could be tied up in the courts until long after January 10, 2009 -- which is exactly the White House game plan.

So, what do we do? First, and as soon as possible after the new Congressional session begins, the Democrats will have subpoena power, if they win back the House and/or Senate. Topic A of hearings:

Why were the threat assessments given George W. Bush and his aides before 9/11 covered-up for so long?

That part has to be explained to the American people, under oath, under the lights before the TV cameras, live and unedited, with no closed classified briefings or grants of immunity to ranking officials. Just the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Tell any lies or hold anything back, and the Chairman will have the Sergeant-at-Arms seize the witness, and whisk that person straight to DC Jail to be held pending trial for perjury and Contempt of Congress. Start the hearings immediately when the new Congress comes back.

CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS

Then, America can move on to prosecute the meat of the matter: 3,000 counts of negligent homicide, reckless endangerment, and manslaughter for criminal acts of commission or omission that resulted in the 9/11 attacks.

______________________________
2006. Mark G. Levey

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Much as I would like to see that on TV
I can only say, don't hold your breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thankfully our $30B intelligence apparatus didn't fail us: only those
elected to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and their appointed minions failed us, or so it would seem. But that is a.o.k. to each and every Amerikan who still supports the man and his PNAC vision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Dereliction of Duty.
What's the threshold for accountability? 30,000 US citizens...300,000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. There has been no accountability and none is likely with the Congress
figuratively jumping through their own assholes to give W torture, suspension of habeas corpus, and dictatorial powers in surely violation of the Constitution: each and every one deserve losing their bid for re-election imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I believe there was a deal made by the Democrats on the commision
that stated, basically, that they would not question the Official Story of 9-11, including when everyone got warnings, IF they would be allowed to state clearly and unequivocally that there was NO connection to Iraq.

They got to look tough and uncompromising about the Iraq stuff, which made the whole Commission Report look legitimate.

Excellent post, btw. Rec'c.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pieces of the puzzle
are beginning to fit together for the genera; public. I got a copy of Woodward's book yesterday, and am about 1/4 through it. I find myself shaking my head, and thinking that this administration's best people failed us utterly. The majority of them betrayed the country in a more extreme manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. It starts with the homicide of the 3,000 Americans, then you must add
the countless deaths, injuries and destruction caused by the ensuing military operations. We need an impartial court and that points to the hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hear, hear. Right here. America and the whole world needs to bring these
people to trial at The Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why was Condi rewarded with her upgrade to Secretary of State ?
Normally, if an NSA failed as spectacularly as she did on 9/11, wouldn't we expect, at the very least, an immediate disgraced firing/resignation? If Tenet didn't do his job before 9/11, why wasn't he booted (he was a Clinton appointee, afterall- what an opportunity to blame the previous administration). Instead, he gets to stay and give bad (?) intel on Iraq...and George gives him a medal when he leaves.

Or maybe they did do their jobs and Bush knew. And they were actually rewarded for putting Dimson's interests ahead of this country's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush Knew Long Before The Planes Flew. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC