Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People who are obsessed with other people's sex lives ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 12:21 PM
Original message
People who are obsessed with other people's sex lives ...
always seem to be doing something inappropriate (and illegal) in their own sex lives.

I know that DUers see the connection between sexual repression and sexual perversion, but has there ever been an actual study on this topic? I've seen so many of the "GOP/RW Sex Scandal" lists over the last few days and I'd really like to know what makes these people tick.

Does anyone have any info or links? :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. and gays against gay marriage - both Rep and Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. not a study, but a very interesting column on the subject from one
of my favourites, mark morford:

Come Back, Clinton Sex Nation
Is the country better off with a president who actually has an active libido? Hell yes.
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist

Wednesday, June 11, 2003


Bill Clinton was damn sexy. Oh yes he was. This is a given.

He had The Appeal. Magnetic, charming as hell, a man who you knew actually had sex and enjoyed it and possessed a highly active all-American libido and knew what all the body parts did and where they went, Hillary notwithstanding.

And yet he was president and that made it all a little weird and unusual and refreshing and then of course it turned ugly, and he was vilified and attacked and sneered at from all corners for overusing this libido, but still, there it is.

And women swooned for him, yes they did, and there were articles and commentaries and even in glossy women's fashion mags they talked up the amazing sex appeal of the president, the Southern charm and masculine assurance and that naughty gleam in his eye.

And women had dreams about him, wrote into magazines and called in to talk shows, and they were sexual dreams, trysts and liaisons and Monicas, because women, well, they knew.

They knew it was genuine. They knew Clinton was an honest appreciator of the female form. You get the distinct feeling that Clinton genuinely and respectfully and with great zeal (and yes, also some very poor taste) truly loved women, loved the female gender, so much so he screwed it all up and took it to painful and finally rather sleazy extremes.
. . . . . . .

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2003/06/11/notes061103.DTL&hw=come+back+clinton+sex+nation+morford&sn=005&sc=1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Great column!
I never saw that before. Thanks for the link. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just look up Sigmund Freud
Edited on Tue Oct-03-06 12:36 PM by TwentyFive
Freud coined the term Projection to describe the process of somebody projecting their own unacceptable thoughts and feelings onto others.

I'd say anybody who calls other people's sex lives perverted (think religious right, catholic church) probably can't deal with their own sexual fantasies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC