Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THIS IS HUGE.....THANKS to Daily Kos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 07:38 PM
Original message
THIS IS HUGE.....THANKS to Daily Kos
Republican Senator Mike DeWine introduced an amendment to reduce the standard of FISA to reasonable "suspicion" for surveillance being acceptable instead of "probable cause."

James Baker, Bush's top snoop dog at the time responsible for preparing all application to FISA for electronic surveillances said we are doing just fine now, thank you. We are moving quickly and effectively thanks to the laws Congress has already passed in the Patriot act. And it is a great concern that lowering this standard would cause constitutional concerns. "Little to gain, perhaps much to lose.

This was in 2002 LONG AFTER 9-11 . DeWine's amendment was rejected in committee by the BUSH ADMINISTRATION


<CLIP>

The admission that Bush's spying program uses a "reasonable suspicion" standard rather than a "probable cause" standard is explosive and damning. Why? Because the Bush administration knew--indeed, took the position--that a reasonable suspicion standard with respect to non-U.S. citizens was probably unconstitutional. Yet the administration now applies that same unconstitutional standard to United States citizens?

In the summer of 2002--well after Bush's spying program was already secretly implemented- the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held a hearing on the DeWine amendment. (Hearing Report PDF) What transpired at that hearing proves that the Bush administration (a) knew that wiretaps of United States citizens are, pursuant to the Constitution, always subject to a probable cause standard; and (b) Congress explicitly rejected a lower standard for non-U.S. citizens.

DeWine himself limited his amendment to apply only to non-U.S. citizens, recognizing that "we must be cautious not to endorse an overly permissive use of the surveillance powers of FISA." The Committee heard testimony from the administration's top lawyers, and from top legal scholars in the field of eavesdropping and criminal law.

James Baker was then counsel for intelligence policy at the Department of Justice and head of the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review, which is the office that prepares and presents to the FISA court "all the applications under the FISA Act for electronic surveillance and physical search of foreign powers and their agents." If there was any expert on FISA warrant and applications at the time, it was Baker. He began his testimony by praising the PATRIOT ACT FISA changes, testifying as follows:

In my view, the changes have allowed us to move more quickly and more effectively and to also be more focused in our approach in dealing with the kinds of threats that Mr. Bowman made reference to. So we at the Department are grateful for the changes that Congress made in the statute, because I believe they've been important and have been employed effectively.


READ THIS ENTIRELY............IT'S FABULOUS STUFF !!! ..... http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/24/181225/664


Can you feel it ? NO IMPEACHMENT, MY ASS !!! :nopity: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very very interesting. Thanks for posting!
K & R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The damning facts just keep
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 07:49 PM by Surya Gayatri
piling up--when does the pile reach critical mass and spontaneously combust? This could prove to be key--if only the CORP MEDIA will pay attention. SG

Edit: K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. It all stems from the Authorizations for Use of Military Force AUMFs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=237272&mesg_id=238357

from Sept 14, 2001 and again for Iraq on Oct 2, 2002.

The offending language is '...as he (Bush) determines...' This is something restricted constitutionally to Congress, who can't abdicate it's powers, but tried to.

The War Powers Act of 1973 is the key to winning Congress back in '06. Dems need to wake up to that fact, and the unconstitutionality of the two AUMF resolutions, upon which Bush claims his new 'magical' powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. Agree, and thanks for the link,
--caught out in their disarray and disbelief, the Congress signed over to the Executive the most crucial of powers reserved for them by those wise FF's over 200 years ago.

REINSTATE CONGRESSIONAL WAR POWERS--RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION!! SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. End 'Discretionary Dictatorship' ! Give Congress their balls back !
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 10:05 AM by EVDebs
Surgeons stand at the ready with Constitutional sutures. Restore testicular fortitude to a balls-less bunch of Republican Majority wimps.

Only Congressional Dems can shame the R's into action. The general public can't do it for them.

Just the first 'shot across the bow', today's paper shows the Army is stretched to the breaking point. This, and many more tidbits to come, can and will be used against the R's in the upcoming '06 elections...where a Dem majority can and will begin processes that will reveal the true extent of the R's gutting of the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. If these were 'normal' times,
the Repubs would be out on their collective ass come Nov.

But, electronic voting fraud has literally falsified the whole equation. We're navigating uncharted waters here--full of unseen & unimagined perils.

Unless & until the voting system is secured, nothing else can be guaranteed. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Can you explain the 44.7% vs. 36% No Shows in this data for 2004
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2391803&mesg_id=2393199

I can't explain how around 9% of potential voters simply vanish. Maybe you can help. Or maybe Karl Rove has the ultimate explanation....wink wink, nod nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Look to those Diebold vote tabulators--
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 04:28 PM by Surya Gayatri
they are ubiquitous and totally compromised.

DIEBOLD (along with ESS and SEQUOIA for that matter) OUT OF MY VOTING BOOTH! SG

spelling edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bump to the top
Can we get this on the front page?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Everybody, click the
first link in the article too, to show just how huge this is. Fabulous explanation by Glen Greenwald.

Just click on the "here."


Talk about Bush drowning in quicksand. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R!!! Keep 'em comin'!!

Dumb king george is going down!!!

:kick::kick::kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. ***Related thread in GD-P Forum:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2389336
thread title (1-24-06 GD-P): R-Sen DeWine tried to eliminate essential part of FISA in June '02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
35. Thanks for that. Greenwald's article came 1st, then kos had it later in
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 02:11 AM by caligirl
the day. Definitly a must read article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. PROBABLE CAUSE.
Guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution?

Damn those LIBERAL founding fathers! RADICAL hippies!


P.S. Resignation is the only remedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. These guys just don't quit n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, they're like a dog that can't make up its mind which leg it wants.
So intent in its purpose and so ridiculous to the objective observer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Impeach, filibuster, or wave buh-bye to America
:hi: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I find your simplistic rendition of the solution very refreshing.
:*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey DeWhine!!
does it hurt when you sit down?

This is EXACTLY the arguement the guy in uniform (NSA) had with a reporter today about the requirements of the 4th amendment..
(Keith O. just ran the clip, then followed it with a reading of the whole 4th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. K.O. is the MAN. I think it's a safe bet that Keith is being wire tapped.
Kick and Nom to the top let's bring down these liars, thief's, and murderers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
34. I think you might be thinking of General Hayden. Saw the interview too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. keeek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Don't these fools realize that the Dems will be in power again, and they
will use these looser standards against the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
36. no
I believe the plan is to never let the democrats in power again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. wowie wow wow! unfreakinbelievable stuff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Holy cow! This impeachment thing is really going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Krathammer, Will, Hoagland and Woodward in all their years
have never equalled this post from Georgia 10. And if you read the thread at dKos it is evident that many many Bloggers are far more capable and insightful than most of the hacks that work at our nations Newspapers. The newspapers are dying for damn good reason. Pour it on bloggers - pour it on - take back the media and take back the country - all in one fell swoop.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. If only you didn't have republicans
that couldn't follow the plan ay Bush? And if you could only push those cell phone inventions up to 2004. :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. these neoCONs are done!
unless we have ANOTHER emergency :argh:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. here is the Homeland Security General Spill'n the Beans yesterday (mp3)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Add your name to the effort of the Conyers IMPEACHMENT ENCAMPMENT!
www.johnconyers.com

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. And Justice, I think you mean it is HUGH!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. James Baker... I spit those words
He's everywhere that's sleazy. He's the slimy underbelly of the whole Bush cabal.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I can't wait
until Kennedy starts ripping Gonzalez a new asshole with this. I may even buy a special chair to watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. Someone needs to..
Rubber-Stamp Gonzalez needs a lesson in the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. can the AG be impeached?
just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
44. read the Kos comments on the thread, NOT the same Baker.
This Baker is not the Bushie scum we all think of when hearing the name. He is, according to a comment, a career type from the Clinton days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bud E. holly Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick!
This would be a real show stopper in the hearings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Wow, just wow
I sent this to Kathy & Mike Malloy...I'm sure he'll cover it. This is truly a smoking gun and we should send it far and wide. To hell with the so-called media...the leftwing blogs will save this country.

K & R :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. Understanding the wiretapping scandal in 1 easy paragraph...
http://sethabramson.blogspot.com/2006/01/understanding-wiretapping-scandal-in.html

...by definition, where probable cause does not exist, no reasonable person could believe that a criminal act had occurred or was presently occurring. The Bush Administration circumvented FISA generally, and the FISA Court specifically--a court which has granted more than 99% of all the warrant applications it's ever received--because the Administration wanted to wiretap Americans under circumstances in which no reasonable person could believe that the targeted American was engaged in criminal conduct of any kind...

-snip-

... Therefore, by definition, the secret NSA wire-tapping program could not have kept Americans safe, as it did no more than randomly and haphazardly wiretap Americans the Administration unreasonably believed dangerous. Nor could any reasonable person, especially an attorney (cf. the Attorney General) have believed the program legal, as no reasonable person would believe the Constitution's clear proscription against unreasonable searches and seizures to allow for searches which are unreasonable by definition...

-snip-

...That the Bush Administration has absolutely no standing or basis to violate this fundamental American principle is proven by the fact that the only people to defend the NSA's wire-tapping program thus far are either attorneys who are employed at the pleasure of the President, or else political activists concerned that this scandal--which is a literal outgrowth of the Watergate scandal, but also exponentially more egregious than that precursor--could and likely will lead to the impeachment of this President, should the Democrats regain the U.S. House in November of this year...

-more-

PROBABLE CAUSE ARE THE OPERATIVE WORDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. They're the last ones left on the Titanic
of Bullshit. We're laughing at em now from the plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
47. See post #46, Bush has determined All DUers to be under suspicion
Anyone who criticizes the administration is subject to the unreasonable search and seizure of their personal data, now offshored thru TIA with the Global Information Group Ltd. in the Bahamas, offshore for plausible deniability and being not subject to the US legal system. Beyond that, combine the RFIDs tracking systems (see www.spychips.com ) along with the abuse of background checks, something that the Christian Science Monitor has been reporting on lately, and you have a built-in harassment program for your political critics, whom Bush mischaracterizes as 'enemies of the state and national security'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
30. Glenn Greenwald originally broke this story. And Joe Klein can fuck off.
Here's Greenwald's post, as referenced by georgia10 at Kos:
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/01/administrations-new-fisa-defense-is.html

And here's Joe Klein's embarrassing statement on CNN: "I bow to nobody in, in my disdain for bloggers. They're all opinions and very little information."
http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=EF96CD2C-FCEF-3C8E-64B5C731986D94D2

Oh yeah? When was the last time fence-sitting, ass-licking Joe Klein reported anything as remotely as important as Glenn Greenwald has?

If all we had was corporate whores of Klein's ilk, Bush would be walking around with a fucking crown on his head by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
33. It sounds like DeWine was trying to do Bush a favor, but it wasn't enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Isn't it obvious?
The Bush Neo Fascist Regime does not give a damn about Democracy.

Their desire is to move the USA toward a Mussolini (Corporate) type of Police State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
37. Now wouldn't a constitutional amendment have to take place,
as in all 50 states would have to vote on said amendment? Congress or the executive, it would seem to me, can't make that sort of change without some more significant and fundamental change to the Constitution. I may be wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Everytime I see the name james Baker
I'm more convinced that the coup was effected in 2000 by Bush Snr.and the gang who are all over tehse despotic acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. It's NOT James A baker III ex secretary of state/may be son though
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 09:36 AM by Carni
Just a head's up the James A Baker at OIPR was not Baker III--I went down that road about three years ago.

James A baker III however does have a son named James A Baker IV--there has been speculation that the son could have been head of the OIPR but it has never been proven one way or another (that I know of) and it remains a mystery (One that I would very much like the answer to!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. No, DeWine's amendment
was just an amendment in a mark up committee for the Patriot Act. And his amendment was only suggesting that they lower the standard to suspicion, rather that probable cause to make it easier for surveillance approval. The beauty of the whole thing is that his amendment was only targeted to OVERSEAS interceptions, and the Bush administration (through Baker) rejected even doing it for International wiretaps.

Now they're doing wiretaps in the U.S. when his own top guy Baker wouldn't approve it, for International purposes because of the constitutional and legal problems. And this was in 2000!!


There is no way out. It's checkmate.........read post #25, follow that info, and enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. War Powers Act of 1973 already limits Presidential powers....
Which is why the two AUMF resolutions are unconstitutional right now ! The wording "...as he determines..." abdicates Congress's power to declare war and gives it unconstitutionally to Bush and for Bush to determine the truthfulness of the pretexts for war, also violating the clarity requirement of the WPA of '73

Bush needs new lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
43. This is incredibly HUGH!!!111!11!!11!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. K & R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tijis Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. Thanks, Glenn!
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 11:41 PM by tijis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Start yourself a thread with this.
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 12:10 AM by Justice Is Comin
This is ultra spectacularly fantabulous. They're spinning counter clockwise going down the toilet.

Welcome to DU and start off with a bang. Get this up or somebody else surely will! :applause: I'm talking about the Washington Post article.

Oh, I see you don't have enough posts yet, I'll get it up if I can. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC