Lieberman says calling for Hastert's resignation partisan!

[femmedem]

Lieberman on Imus, speaking about Foley:

<snip>

Now to make it into a political question is wrong.

<snip>

So I don't know., if I were Hastert I would bring someone in quickly do the investigation and then somebody has got to be held accountable for what happened assuming that they had reason to know what was going on and they didn't act quickly enough because if they don't do something soon they are bleeding politically from it and they may not be convicted in a court of law but they are going to be convicted in the court of public opinion that will be registered on November seventh, so far I think they have handled it very badly."

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2006/10/4/1963/77872/20#c20

So, um, Lieberman thinks Hastert should appoint someone to investigate...Hastert...otherwise the Repugs will lose in November?

[Mountainman]

1. Why doesn't he just change parties?

[NNN0LHI]

20. I think he did already. He is an independent n/t

[Kahuna]

24. I hope we win with a few seats to spare so we can give him to the

repukes and make it official.

[Dr Fate]

2. Typical, expected protection of conservatives from Holy Joe.

n/t

[Hav]

3. .

The way he's talking is remarkable...he talks as if he is one of them. He almost seems concerned that they are "bleeding politically".

[William Bloode]

4. Please all that is holy, or unholy i don't care. But Joe Gotta go!

The great enabler strikes again.:puke:

[berni_mccoy]

5. The only votes LIEberman will get is extreme rwers

He's gonna lose big in CT.

[ikojo]

6. Calling for Haster's resignation because he did not

keep check on a pedophile is partisan but supporting a partisan attack on the president, who is of your party, is bi partisan?

Oy vey! Did this man NOT read the Yom Kippur Machzor on Monday? I have an Artscroll Machzor should Reb LIEberman need to avail himself of one.

Since when is PARTISAN a bad word? Why is it such a BAD THING, Rabbi Yosef, to SUPPORT YOUR PARTY?

[Cha]

12. Ye Gods! I forgot about that..lieman's big

santimonious call for Clinton's impeachment and no hastert doesn't need to resign because he was involved in a coverup of mark foley's acting on his rapacious lecherous desires.

[shrub chipper]

7. asshole n/t

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

8. When is Joe going to morph into Zell Miller,

spittle and throbbing veins and all? Jeez.

[ikojo]

9. When Zell converts. nt

[Monkeyman]

19. Halloween

[KamaAina]

10. Doggone that lib'rul media!

Washington Times, New York Times, what's the difference? And that left-wing pinko Richard Viguerie, when has he ever been anything but partisan?

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

[BuyingThyme]

11. He's right on this one. Insisting that people vote according to

what representatives do is not the right way to approach democracy.

[Cha]

13. Oh fuck you, you little partisian

hack.

[survivor999]

14. He needs the Repubs

to be elected as Independent.

[Cha]

15. I know..it's too

obvious what he's doing.

[spanone]

16. I hope as these slimeballs go down they take this chump with them.

[DRoseDARs]

17. There goes Holy Joe's reelection bid and perhaps with it any bite...

...he might've taken out of the Dem ticket in Connecticut. I would hope that many conservative voters that would have voted for "independant" Lieberman won't look kindly on someone supporting a man who covered for Foley.

[yurbud]

18. he's not going to be a lobbyist--he's going to be a Fox News anchor

[catmandu57]

21. Since when do we give a flying fuck what holy joe thinks?

Fuck him and the pig he's riding on now, go away your ugly and your momma dressed you funny.

[Jack Rabbit]

22. I'm really fed up with this idiot (rant)

And I do mean idiot.

No, it's not because he's been wrong, wrong, wrong about the invasion and occupation of Iraq from the start. It's not that he's been a treacherous enabler of the fascist Bush regime. It's not that he's willing to sell civil liberties and human rights down the river for a failed and fraudulent anti-terror policy.

Although those are reasons enough to toss him out of the senate on his ear.

It's that he's more afraid of being called a "partisan" than he is about doing the right thing.

That is just stupid.

There, now I feel better.

[CatWoman]

23. will someone PLEASE shut him the fuck up??

[mcscajun]

26. Let him rant...he loses Democratic votes every time he opens his mouth

and shows himself a Republican.

[WI_DEM]

25. I hope this causes the remaining dems and indies in CT who support him

to give him the heave-ho and say, "Lieberman is nothing but a Republican shill."

[fishwax]

27. no surprise there

the last thing lieberman would want to do would be a democratic partisan.

[Blue-Jay]

28. Lamont needs to latch on to that quote like a lamprey.

[enigmacat]

29. Is LIEberman still around?

[Zhade]

"they are bleeding politically..."

Funny, you'd think someone who supports Democratic ideals and candidates wouldn't be worried about that kind of thing.

But then, we ARE talking about lieberman the betrayer, so...

[Connie_Corleone]

30. He better tell that to the Republicans...

because they're the ones calling for Hastert's fat head!

[pdxmom]

31. Let him blather. The more he opens his mouth and inserts his foot, the

better his chances of losing in November. Let everyone see what he really is.

[bluerum]

32. Joe - S.T.F.U. Go away. Run for dog catcher in Brazil. Just leave.